1992
DOI: 10.2307/2388473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Demography and Growth Rates of Espeletia barclayana Cuatrec. (Compositae), a Caulescent Rosette in a Colombian Paramo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
12

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a high growth rate is very important for very small plants because individuals that grow quickly and/or retain old leaves on their stems (necromass) are more likely to survive cold and drought, as observed in other Espeletia (Smith, 1979(Smith, , 1981Goldstein et al, 1985;Monasterio, 1986;Mora-Osejo and Sturm, 1994). Consequently, growth rate decreased with increasing plant size because once nutrients are no longer intensively used in vegetative growth they could be relocated to the construction of reproductive structures (e.g., Cavalier et al, 1992), such as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Mortality and Growth Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, a high growth rate is very important for very small plants because individuals that grow quickly and/or retain old leaves on their stems (necromass) are more likely to survive cold and drought, as observed in other Espeletia (Smith, 1979(Smith, , 1981Goldstein et al, 1985;Monasterio, 1986;Mora-Osejo and Sturm, 1994). Consequently, growth rate decreased with increasing plant size because once nutrients are no longer intensively used in vegetative growth they could be relocated to the construction of reproductive structures (e.g., Cavalier et al, 1992), such as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Mortality and Growth Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most Espeletia biology is known from observations made in Venezuelan dry Páramos (i.e., < 1000 mm of mean annual rainfall), a region holding only 20 % of the total known area of the Páramos. Almost all Espeletia species studied thus far are slowgrowing plants (e.g., 1 -2 cm/year and maturation at 20 years for Espeletia spicata), strongly self-incompatible and reproduce primarily through seed production (Smith, 1981;Berry and Calvo, 1989;Estrada and Monasterio, 1991;Cavalier et al, 1992). Bumblebees and hummingbirds are major pollinators of Espeletia, although some species inhabiting Páramos above 4000 m have adapted to wind pollination Calvo, 1989, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesar que la supervivencia de las plantas jóvenes reubicadas es mayor a la encontrada en condiciones naturales, el aumento del porcentaje de supervivencia conforme aumenta el tamaño de los individuos se mantiene, lo cual es consistente con lo encontrado para la población estudiada por Fagua & González (2007) en E. grandiflora y por Smith (1981), Monasterio & Lamotte (1987), Estrada & Monasterio (1988), Monasterio & Lamotte (1989), Cavelier et al (1992) y Silva et al (2000) para otras especies del género. La menor mortalidad de los plantas reubicadas frente a las plantas en condiciones naturales puede deberse a la disminución de los efectos negativos de la densidad poblacional, como la presentada por E. schultzii en los páramos de Venezuela (Llambí et al 2004), ya que al ser reubicados a distancias equidistantes puede llegar a disminuir los efectos de la densodependencia y competencia intra-específica; así mismo, el haber eliminado temporalmente la matriz de pastos exóticos pudo disminuir la competencia inter-específica generada por otras especies dominantes y aumentar la probabilidad de supervivencia.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…El crecimiento de todos los individuos durante los 24 meses de estudio fue suficiente para considerarlos en la categoría de tamaño siguiente; no obstante, las plantas del género Espeletia son consideradas como de lento crecimiento (Estrada & Monasterio 1991, Cavelier et al 1992. La tasa de crecimiento relativo de los individuos reubicados, tanto en altura como en diámetro del tallo, es menor conforme aumenta el tamaño de la planta (Cuadro 3, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…There are many studies involving the ecology of leaves, some focusing on leaf longevity and carbon gain (Bentley, 1979;Chabot and Hicks, 1982;Harper, 1989;Mulkey et al, 1991;Reich et al, 1992;Coley et al, 1993;Mulkey et al, 1993;Walker and Aplet, 1994;Kikuzawa, 1995;Kitajima et al, 1997;Freiberg and Freiberg, 1999;Kursar and Coley, 1999), others dealing with leaf dynamics (Jurik and Chabot, 1986;Escudero and Del Arco, 1987;Costa and Seeliger, 1988a,b;Hegarty, 1990;Costa et al, 1991;Cavelier et al, 1992;Clark et al, 1992;Lowman, 1992;Aide, 1993;Telenius, 1993;Diemer, 1998;Carvalho et al, 1999;Santos, 2000;Williams-Linera, 2000), and still others accessing questions related to allometry and leaf size (Parkhurst and Louks, 1972;Richards, 1976;Dolph and Dilcher, 1980;Kohyama, 1987;Kohyama and Hotta, 1990;Sterk and Bonges, 1998;Becker et al, 1999;Valladares et al, 2002). Yet, in tropical forests, studies of leaf dynamics of herbaceous plants are few (Mulkey et al, 1991;Sharpe, 1993;Horvitz and Schemske, 1995;Bruna and Kress, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%