1995
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/46.3.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf elongation and water relations of mycorrhizal sorghum in response to partial soil drying: twoGlomusspecies at varying phosphorus fertilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mycorrhizal symbiosis has modified host hormonal relations Danneberg et al 1992;Goicoechea et al 1997a;Nikolaou et al 2003), and we investigated the possibility that mycorrhizal fungi, which are confined to outer root tissues, were affecting distant organs like leaf stomata by changing the hormonal flow of information from roots to shoots in the transpiration stream. Working with maize, sorghum and cowpea, we did not observe much effect of mycorrhizal symbiosis on g s or plant water relations under conditions where strictly nonhydraulic signaling of soil drying prevailed Ebel et al 1994;Augé et al 1995).…”
Section: Mycorrhizae and Plant Water Relationscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Mycorrhizal symbiosis has modified host hormonal relations Danneberg et al 1992;Goicoechea et al 1997a;Nikolaou et al 2003), and we investigated the possibility that mycorrhizal fungi, which are confined to outer root tissues, were affecting distant organs like leaf stomata by changing the hormonal flow of information from roots to shoots in the transpiration stream. Working with maize, sorghum and cowpea, we did not observe much effect of mycorrhizal symbiosis on g s or plant water relations under conditions where strictly nonhydraulic signaling of soil drying prevailed Ebel et al 1994;Augé et al 1995).…”
Section: Mycorrhizae and Plant Water Relationscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Stomatal conductance in AM plants has also remained unaffected by declines in available soil moisture longer than in nonAM plants (Osundina 1995;Duan et al 1996). Furthermore, AM plants showed higher gs than nonAM plants when only a portion of a root system was dried and before drying affected leaf water status and these effects occurred independently of plant size or phosphorus nutrition through nonhydraulic signals (Augé et al 1992b(Augé et al , 1994(Augé et al , 1995. In this context, it has been shown that when AM and nonAM plants were exposed to similar soil water deficits, gs of AM and nonAM plants were still different, suggesting also that the AM influence on gs is of biochemical nature (Augé 2000).…”
Section: Stomatal Behaviour Of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Plants Under Osmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)-(3), but comes naturally from the OhmÕs law formulation. Split-root experiments have indicated that values of the parameter c can range from one to more than two (e.g., 26,19,1,14,6,12,37]). Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%