1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-2194(96)00101-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf folding behaviour of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) and Marasmia patnalis Bradley, and the influence of rice leaf morphology on damage incidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have also reported the positive correlation between damaged leaves with length and width of the flag leaf as RLF prefers the broad, greenish and long flag leaves than the narrow and smaller leaves due to their tough mid rib (Islam and Karim 1997;Chalapathirao et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Previous studies have also reported the positive correlation between damaged leaves with length and width of the flag leaf as RLF prefers the broad, greenish and long flag leaves than the narrow and smaller leaves due to their tough mid rib (Islam and Karim 1997;Chalapathirao et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although screening of rice germplasm collections has identiÞed cultivars and wild species with resistance to pyralid leaffolders, no rice varieties with high levels of resistance to these insects have been released (Pathak and Khan 1994). Among the traits that have been found to contribute to resistance to leaffolders in rice are leaf morphology (Islam and Karim 1997) and silica content (Ramachandran and Khan 1991). Varieties with narrow leaves are apparently more resistant because it is more difÞcult for leaffolders to fold the leaves and form the protective compartment in which they feed (Islam and Karim 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the traits that have been found to contribute to resistance to leaffolders in rice are leaf morphology (Islam and Karim 1997) and silica content (Ramachandran and Khan 1991). Varieties with narrow leaves are apparently more resistant because it is more difÞcult for leaffolders to fold the leaves and form the protective compartment in which they feed (Islam and Karim 1997). In group D1, in which the hybrid IR64616H was more resistant than its parental lines, leaf width did not differ signiÞcantly among the four lines at 1, 8, or 15 d after infestation (C.C.B., unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely distributed in China, Japan, Korea, India, Vietnam, Thailand, the Philippines, Malaysia and other Asian countries . The larvae feed on rice leaves by folding and scraping the leaf surfaces, which may result in reduced photosynthesis and yields . In the 1960s, the rice leaffolder was a minor pest in China, and has gradually become a major pest in recent years, probably as a consequence of the cultivation of susceptible high‐yielding varieties and high applications of nitrogen fertilizers and pesticides .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such behaviors result in a reduction of photosynthesis of the folded leaves . The third‐ to fifth‐instar larvae usually fold the leaves longitudinally with the abaxial surface inside the folds, while younger larvae usually only roll the leaf edges . The folding and spinning behavior of the rice leaffolder could also be influenced by the genotypes of rice varieties and rice leaf morphology , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%