2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2007.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf litter decomposition in a southern Sonoran Desert ecosystem, northwestern Mexico: Effects of habitat and litter quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
1
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
25
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Litter chemistry and quality vary with vegetation type and likely control rates of litter decomposition and accumulation of SOC. Previous work in Sonoran Desert ecosystems found litter quality, and particularly lignin content, as a significant control of leaf litter decomposition rate (Martínez-Yrízar et al, 2007). Similarly, Vaieretti et al (2005) and Gallardo and Merino (1993) found good correlation between vegetation type and rates of litter decomposition in semiarid ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Litter chemistry and quality vary with vegetation type and likely control rates of litter decomposition and accumulation of SOC. Previous work in Sonoran Desert ecosystems found litter quality, and particularly lignin content, as a significant control of leaf litter decomposition rate (Martínez-Yrízar et al, 2007). Similarly, Vaieretti et al (2005) and Gallardo and Merino (1993) found good correlation between vegetation type and rates of litter decomposition in semiarid ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In the Sonoran Desert, spatial heterogeneity in vegetation structure eeven among adjacent sitese has been related to strong differences in primary productivity (Maya and Arriaga, 1996;Martínez-Yrízar et al, 1999;Sponseller and Fisher, 2006), microbial potential of soils (Núñez et al, 2001) and decomposition rates (Arriaga and Maya, 2007;Martínez-Yrízar et al, 2007). Plant biomass is also likely to exhibit strong spatial variability, but its quantification has been a neglected aspect of ecosystem studies in this region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Subsequently, litter decomposition was assessed for each time period by measuring the dry weight of oven-dried litter bag leaves after the extraction of fauna. The remaining dry mass was expressed as percentage of the initial sample dry mass (Martínez-Yrízar et al 2007). Remaining dry mass values were transformed into square roots (Zar 1999) to determine differences in leaf decomposition between sites and among sampling times, using a multifactor analysis of variance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remaining dry mass values were transformed into square roots (Zar 1999) to determine differences in leaf decomposition between sites and among sampling times, using a multifactor analysis of variance. The relationships between remaining litter mass and time (days) were tested by fitting it to negative exponential decomposition models (Martínez-Yrízar et al 2007, Adair et al 2010. Total decay rate (k-value) for each forest was calculated by the negative exponential regression of ln(X 0 /X 1 ) vs. time, where X 0 is the original dry mass, X 1 is the percentage of leaf litter remaining after time 1 (time in days).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%