2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf ontogeny strongly influences photosynthetic tolerance to drought and high temperature in Gossypium hirsutum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies also addressed that previous exposure to drought stress increased photosynthetic tolerance (photosystem II thermostability) to high temperature in cotton leaves, especially in young leaves (Snider et al 2013, Chastain et al 2016. Despite higher Pn and photosynthate concentrations of subtending leaves, boll biomass was still lower for EW 3 relative to EC, indicating limited sucrose translocation from the subtending leaf to the developing boll, which agrees with work evaluating carbohydrate dynamics within developing cotton fibers (Chen et al 2017b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies also addressed that previous exposure to drought stress increased photosynthetic tolerance (photosystem II thermostability) to high temperature in cotton leaves, especially in young leaves (Snider et al 2013, Chastain et al 2016. Despite higher Pn and photosynthate concentrations of subtending leaves, boll biomass was still lower for EW 3 relative to EC, indicating limited sucrose translocation from the subtending leaf to the developing boll, which agrees with work evaluating carbohydrate dynamics within developing cotton fibers (Chen et al 2017b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Thus, the accumulation of evidence in the current study support our hypothesis that previous exposure to mild waterlogging stress during early boll development may improve tolerance of leaves to continuous elevated temperature later in development, which strengthens the case for cross‐acclimation between these two stressors. Other studies also addressed that previous exposure to drought stress increased photosynthetic tolerance (photosystem II thermostability) to high temperature in cotton leaves, especially in young leaves (Snider et al , Chastain et al ). Despite higher P n and photosynthate concentrations of subtending leaves, boll biomass was still lower for EW 3 relative to EC, indicating limited sucrose translocation from the subtending leaf to the developing boll, which agrees with work evaluating carbohydrate dynamics within developing cotton fibers (Chen et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 2) and ETR (Exp. This agrees closely with studies on field-grown cotton in which chlorophyll content in developing leaves increased as leaf area declined and specific leaf weight increased (Chastain et al, 2016). One limitation to the current study is that we are unable to distinguish between chloroplast and mitochondria-derived ATP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…By comparison, at 5 WAP, significant, positive correlations were observed between A n and ETR, ETR a , ETR p , A g , R d , and g s but not between A n and ETR a /ETR p , C c , or C i (Table 7). Similarly, low A n in unexpanded leaves has been associated with lower g s and ETR in previous experiments (Chastain et al, 2016;Hall, Chastain, Horn, Chapman, & Choinski, 2014;Snider et al, 2009). However, while g s was strongly correlated with A n in this experiment, we cannot assume in this instance that low g s represents a diffusional limitation to photosynthesis since substomatal and chloroplast concentrations of CO 2 were not correlated with A n .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%