1975
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-65-805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf, Stem, Crown, and Root Galls Induced in Chrysanthemum by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown previously (Miller 1975;Miller et al 1975;van Wordragen et al 1991;Bush & Pueppke 1991), differences in the the percentage of tumour formation were observed between chrysanthemum explants inoculated with different wild-type strains of A. tumefaciens. In the present work, the highest frequency of tumour formation was obtained using the strain A6.…”
Section: Host Range Studysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…As shown previously (Miller 1975;Miller et al 1975;van Wordragen et al 1991;Bush & Pueppke 1991), differences in the the percentage of tumour formation were observed between chrysanthemum explants inoculated with different wild-type strains of A. tumefaciens. In the present work, the highest frequency of tumour formation was obtained using the strain A6.…”
Section: Host Range Studysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It has been reported that the vir (virulence) regions of the Ti plasmid carried by these strains are similar (Kovács and Pueppke 1994). Both strains have been isolated from Compositae plants: strain Bo542 from dahlia (Montoya et al 1977) and strain Chry5 from chrysanthemum (Miller 1975). The genetic and phylogenetic relationships between strain CNI5 and these supervirulent type strains are interesting topics for future investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Once the susceptibility of chrysanthemums to Agrobacterium tumefaciens was reported (De Cleene and De Ley 1976;Hooykaas and Beijersbergen 1994;Miller 1975), the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of chrysanthemum was studied worldwide. However, some barriers to the establishment of a chrysanthemum transformation system have been reported: low transformation e ciency (De Jong et al 1994;Renou et al 1993;Urban et al 1994), regeneration of chimeric plants comprising both transgenic and non-transgenic tissues (Benetka and Pavingerová 1995;Pavingerová et al 1994) and transgene inactivation, also known as gene silencing (Takatsu et al 2000).…”
Section: Agrobacterium-mediated Genetic Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, advances in biotechnology have made possible the addition of new traits that are unachievable via conventional or mutation breeding . A er the rst report on the susceptibility of chrysanthemum plants to Agrobacterium (Miller 1975), many researchers have tried to introduce useful agronomical traits into chrysanthemums via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%