2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.b35039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leakage Uncertainties in Compressors: The Case of Rotor 37

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(20). We omit a detailed flow validation here and direct interested readers to Refs (24,29), where experiment vs CFD validations for the PADRAM-HYDRA suite of tools are provided for representative transonic fan blades. Boundary conditions and the inlet Reynolds number for the four design of experiments carried out in this study are given in Table 2.…”
Section: Computational Flow Solver and Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20). We omit a detailed flow validation here and direct interested readers to Refs (24,29), where experiment vs CFD validations for the PADRAM-HYDRA suite of tools are provided for representative transonic fan blades. Boundary conditions and the inlet Reynolds number for the four design of experiments carried out in this study are given in Table 2.…”
Section: Computational Flow Solver and Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very high pressure ratio, strong shock wave-boundary layer interaction, large tipleakage vortex and highly separated flow mean that it poses challenges for turbomachinery solvers. Rotor 37 has been the subject of review articles that highlight the complexity of matching experimental and computational measurements and the associated uncertainties [19] [20] [21].…”
Section: St Case: Nasa Rotor 37mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences are usually attributed to uncertainty in the experimental measurements, the lack of real geometry in the simulations (e.g. the upstream hub cavity is usually missing) [21] and also the difficulty in fully resolving the complex flows. Figures 6 and 7 show comparisons of the current simulation results versus the experiment.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pranay Seshadri (Seshadri et al, 2014) studied the influence of tip clearance variation in aerodynamic performances and showed that higher efficiency in tip region can produce higher mixed-out losses. Pranay Seshadri (Seshadri et al, 2015) concentrated on the uncertainty of leakage mass flow, leakage whirl velocity, and radial flow angle, and stressed on the influence of leakage flow on the hub pressure deficit at both on-and off-design conditions. Remy Nigro (Nigro et al, 2017) studied correlated uncertainties on the blade geometry of the NASA Rotor 37.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%