2014
DOI: 10.1080/02185385.2014.885213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lean on me: the potential for peer support in a non-government Australian mental health service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another finding from this study was the need to ensure on-going support for program staff [40], with this program experiencing a high staff turnover. Staff shortages and high rates of turnover could be due to a number of reasons including lack of adequate peer support [41] and the recruitment of staff who either do not possess adequate skills [42][43][44] or are perceived by the community as not possessing adequate skills for their roles [45]. Programs that demonstrate success in improving mental health outcomes, by contrast, have highly qualified staff, and provide opportunities for staff to gain additional training in topics specific to the program [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another finding from this study was the need to ensure on-going support for program staff [40], with this program experiencing a high staff turnover. Staff shortages and high rates of turnover could be due to a number of reasons including lack of adequate peer support [41] and the recruitment of staff who either do not possess adequate skills [42][43][44] or are perceived by the community as not possessing adequate skills for their roles [45]. Programs that demonstrate success in improving mental health outcomes, by contrast, have highly qualified staff, and provide opportunities for staff to gain additional training in topics specific to the program [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite plenty of anecdotal evidence, the robust evaluation of peer-interventions is limited, and the evaluation of youth peer support is even more lacking. Studies in the Netherlands (Van Gestel-Timmermans et al, 2012), the United States (Fukui et al, 2010) and Australia (Davies et al, 2014), among others (Ahmed et al, 2012;Davidson et al, 2012;Sledge et al, 2011;Lawn et al, 2008;Min et al, 2007;Forchuk et al, 2005) have begun to demonstrate the effectiveness of existing peer led interventions; however these studies have focused on the outcomes for clients and less on the process of implementing peer programs and the broader implication of servicewide change. A recent scoping review (Gopalan et al, 2017) has uncovered the wide range of roles which Youth Peer Support Workers (YPSW) are beginning to undertake within mental health care services, while also highlighting that again, the majority of evaluative studies focus on youth outcomes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing service‐user participation strategies have been criticised as tokenistic. Service‐user representatives report unrealistic expectations of peer support workers, where the emphasis is on their ability to adapt to workplace standards rather than the organisation's willingness to facilitate compensatory adaptive workplace practices (Davies, Gray, & Butcher, ).…”
Section: A Policy‐driven Responsementioning
confidence: 99%