2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LEAP-GWU-2015 centrifuge test at UC Davis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 13.1 details the test geometry, sensor locations, and PVC blocks in model scale. Note that Carey et al (2017) used a different model container and spacer configuration for LEAP-GWU-2015.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 13.1 details the test geometry, sensor locations, and PVC blocks in model scale. Note that Carey et al (2017) used a different model container and spacer configuration for LEAP-GWU-2015.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 5-degree slope from the normal of the radial g-field would have a varying radius along the slope of the model surface, which is described theoretically by a log-spiral. Carey et al 2017 showed that rotating a circular arc by 5 degrees is a reasonable approximation for the log-spiral surface. Figure 13.2 shows the wooden template fabricated to approximate the log-spiral surface of the model.…”
Section: Description Of the Model And Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…LEAP is an international collaboration aiming to establish rigorous protocols for validation of soil liquefaction numerical models for practical applications (Kutter et al 2015;Manzari et al 2015). LEAP has several exercises focusing on different aspects of liquefaction (Carey et al 2017). In LEAP-Kyoto-2013 and LEAP-Kyoto-2014, some inconsistencies at different centrifuge facilities were noted due to laminar containers, which also caused challenges for numerical simulations (Tobita et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%