1978
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3.795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Learned Helplessness,” “Learned Hopefulness,” and “Learned Obsessiveness”: Effects of Varying. Contingencies on Escape Responding

Abstract: Two types of outcome appearing in most research on learned helplessness were studied. Subjects performing under an extinction, i.e., non-occurring, programmed outcome evidenced “learned helplessness.” Contrary to learned helplessness theory, however, most subjects given response-independent outcomes developed superstitious behavior and reported perceived control of events. Subjects in a third group whose responses were reinforced during a 50-trial “training” phase showed response “excesses” during 10 subsequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He reported that under mixed random or mixed fixed reinforcement schedules, participants believed that their presses effectively prevented the tones. Similarly, Stegman and McReynolds (1978) reported that 6 of 10 people exposed to response-independent presentations of an aversive tone developed a superstitious belief that pressing a button eliminated the noxious stimulus. Very little research has examined superstition formation resulting from noncontingent delivery of punishment because such a procedure frequently produces learned helplessness (Maier & Seligman, 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…He reported that under mixed random or mixed fixed reinforcement schedules, participants believed that their presses effectively prevented the tones. Similarly, Stegman and McReynolds (1978) reported that 6 of 10 people exposed to response-independent presentations of an aversive tone developed a superstitious belief that pressing a button eliminated the noxious stimulus. Very little research has examined superstition formation resulting from noncontingent delivery of punishment because such a procedure frequently produces learned helplessness (Maier & Seligman, 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although there have been more studies utilizing response independent delivery of putative positive reinforcers (e.g., Ono, 1987), superstitious behavior and belief can be produced by response-independent removal or prevention of an aversive stimulus or loss of a reinforcer (e.g., Cerutti, 1991; Matute, 1994, 1995; Stegman & McReynolds, 1978). According to Aeschleman, Rosen, and Williams (2003), many examples of superstitious behavior in humans appear to involve avoidance (e.g., knocking on wood to ward off bad luck).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%