2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-006-9016-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learned student models with item to item knowledge structures

Abstract: Abstract. Probabilistic and learned approaches to student modeling are attractive because of the uncertainty surrounding the student skills assessment and because of the need to automatize the process. Item to item structures readily lend themselves to probabilistic and fully learned models because they are solely composed of observable nodes, like answers to test questions. Their structure is also well grounded in the cognitive theory of knowledge spaces. We study the effectiveness of two Bayesian frameworks … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This would not the case if we wanted to predict the mastery of a set of (unobservable) skills, in which case both approaches would require some knowledge engineering eort, such as dening a Q-matrix or dening the topology of a Bayesian Network, as well as independent means to assess the skills for validation purpose. Similar studies were conducted by Desmarais et al, [6,7]. These studies respectively compared the performance of a Bayesian Network developed by Vomlel [23] and of the IRT approach with a derivative of a Naive Bayes item-to-item model (POKS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would not the case if we wanted to predict the mastery of a set of (unobservable) skills, in which case both approaches would require some knowledge engineering eort, such as dening a Q-matrix or dening the topology of a Bayesian Network, as well as independent means to assess the skills for validation purpose. Similar studies were conducted by Desmarais et al, [6,7]. These studies respectively compared the performance of a Bayesian Network developed by Vomlel [23] and of the IRT approach with a derivative of a Naive Bayes item-to-item model (POKS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Bayesian Network) is a compromise between a number of factors to consider, such as knowledge engineering eorts, computational complexity, and most importantly reliability and accuracy of predictions. A number of researchers in the learner modeling eld have investigated this issue over the last decade or so [22,5,4,6,1,15]. This paper revisits the issue of assessing item-to-item model performance by comparing the predictive accuracy of standard Bayesian classier algorithms [10] to create item-to-item learner models with that of the IRT approach (see [21]), which contains a single latent skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ALEKS is a commercial spin off of the University of California at Irvine and is based on the cognitive theory of knowledge spaces Falmagne 1999, 1985). This theory is at the basis of a number of efforts and active developments in the field of learner modeling (Heller et al 2006;Desmarais et al 2006).…”
Section: Content Sequencing Tutorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to Bayesian networks, an implication network model employs a partial order knowledge structure (POKS) for structural learning and uses the Bayesian theory for inference propagation [201,202]. When using Dempster-Shafer theory for belief updating, this implication network methodology is termed a DempsterShafer belief network [203,204].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%