2007
DOI: 10.1080/14794800008520167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learners’ Understanding of the Definitions and Hierarchical Classification of Quadrilaterals: Towards a Theoretical Framing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
94
2
35

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
13
94
2
35
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be stressed that a typical (prototype) example has been the key factor for the further use of the concept (Türnüklü et al 2013). It has been common for pre-service teachers to use their own image of figures to create their definition (Fujita and Jones 2007). Additionally, research results show that they have actually defined prototypical images (Ozdemir and Dur 2014).…”
Section: Teachers' Understanding Of Basic Geometric Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be stressed that a typical (prototype) example has been the key factor for the further use of the concept (Türnüklü et al 2013). It has been common for pre-service teachers to use their own image of figures to create their definition (Fujita and Jones 2007). Additionally, research results show that they have actually defined prototypical images (Ozdemir and Dur 2014).…”
Section: Teachers' Understanding Of Basic Geometric Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Some of studies have relied on examination of knowledge of basic definitions, such as the definitions of angle, polygon, triangle, rectangle, trapezoid, parallelogram, rhombus, oblong, square, deltoid, and circle. Very often the concept of trapezoid was examine (Fujita and Jones 2007;Usiskin and Griffin 2008;Türnüklü et al 2013;Ozdemir and Dur 2014;Brunheira and da Ponte 2015). This can be observed in regard to the formal definition of trapezoids and general mathematical assumptions (Fig.…”
Section: Teachers' Understanding Of Basic Geometric Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the majority of studies have concentrated on descriptive (a posteriori) defining; for example, defining circles, triangles, quadrilaterals, and polyhedra after exploring their properties with the use of DGEs, paper-folding, and/or pencil-and-paper construction (c.f. Choi and Oh 2008;Fujita & Jones, 2007;Salinas, Lynch-Davis, Mawhinney, & Crocker, 2014;Usiskin, Griffin, Witonsky, & Willmore, 2008;Zandieh & Rasmussen, 2010). …”
Section: The Teaching and Learning Of Geometric Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the hierarchical nature of quadrilaterals is problematic for learners (Fujita and Jones 2007) and throughout this episode Karin focused attention not only on the conceptual basis of this hierarchy but also the logic underpinning it. In so doing she emphasised the important understanding that no one approach to defining quadrilaterals, whether by angle, diagonal or edge, is sufficient.…”
Section: Karin's Teaching Of Polygonsmentioning
confidence: 99%