2009
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2008.2008956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning a Channelized Observer for Image Quality Assessment

Abstract: It is now widely accepted that image quality should be evaluated using task-based criteria, such as human-observer performance in a lesion-detection task. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) has been widely used as a surrogate for human observers in evaluating lesion detectability. In this paper, we propose that the problem of developing a numerical observer can be viewed as a system-identification or supervised-learning problem, in which the goal is to identify the unknown system of the human observer. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approaches have routinely beaten state-of-the-art pattern recognition methods, as well as humans in some selected areas. In SPECT, supervised learning and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with three layers have shown promising MO results with simulated data [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches have routinely beaten state-of-the-art pattern recognition methods, as well as humans in some selected areas. In SPECT, supervised learning and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with three layers have shown promising MO results with simulated data [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task-based image quality assessment approaches [1,2] characterize the image quality by measuring the performance of an observer, most oftenly a human observer, in completing a specific diagnostic task. Model observers (MOs) [3] have been proposed as surrogates for human observers to avoid the costly and time-consuming procedure involving human observers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ultimate goal of medical images is to aid clinicians in rendering a diagnosis, it is widely accepted that in order to optimize diagnostic decisions image quality should be as good as possible. Additionally, image quality should be assessed in the context of a specific diagnostic task, the so-called taskbased approach [2], [3]. During the assessment process, one or more diagnostic tasks could be performed by either human observers (radiologists) or numerical observers (mathematical models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it has been argued that numerical observers are useful for medical image quality assessment in place of human observers [2], [6]. However, in most cases, the task performance of human observers is the ultimate test of image quality and is needed for the validation of a numerical observer [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%