2020 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iccp48838.2020.9105133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning a Probabilistic Strategy for Computational Imaging Sensor Selection

Abstract: Optimized sensing is important for computational imaging in low-resource environments, when images must be recovered from severely limited measurements. In this paper, we propose a physics-constrained, fully differentiable, autoencoder that learns a probabilistic sensor-sampling strategy for optimized sensor design. The proposed method learns a system's preferred sampling distribution that characterizes the correlations between different sensor selections as a binary, fully-connected Ising model. The learned p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, [1,43,48] proposed co-design frameworks for 2D Cartesian κ-space sampling and [39,42] applied co-design to 2D radial κ-space sampling. 1 These methods have shown superior performance over previous baselines that combine an individually-optimized sampler and reconstructor pair [1,34,39,43,48]. However, these methods do not take advantage of the sequential nature of data collection during an MRI scan, and only solve for a generic sampling pattern for an entire dataset.…”
Section: Co-designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, [1,43,48] proposed co-design frameworks for 2D Cartesian κ-space sampling and [39,42] applied co-design to 2D radial κ-space sampling. 1 These methods have shown superior performance over previous baselines that combine an individually-optimized sampler and reconstructor pair [1,34,39,43,48]. However, these methods do not take advantage of the sequential nature of data collection during an MRI scan, and only solve for a generic sampling pattern for an entire dataset.…”
Section: Co-designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches that seek to combine co-design and sequential sampling strategies have been proposed, however with only limited success thus far. The work of [14] draws inspiration from AlphaGo [31] and trains a sampler to emulate the policy distribution obtained through a Monte Carlo Tree 1 Differentiable co-design of sensing and reconstruction methods has also been successfully applied to other imaging domains as well [34]. Search (MCTS); the reconstructor is trained during alternating optimization steps.…”
Section: Co-design and Sequential Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deterministic sensing patterns have been jointly optimized with neural-network based reconstruction schemes in designing the color multiplexing pattern of camera sensors [4], the LED illumination pattern in Fourier ptychography [11], the optical parameters of a camera lens [19], and microscopy cell detection [28]. More recently, stochastic sampling of sensing patterns have been explored in the context of CS magnetic resonance imaging [1,32] and very-long-baseline-interferometry (VLBI) array design [22]. In this paper, we extend the idea of joint optimization of sensing strategies and neural-network based reconstruction to CS-FM.…”
Section: Sensing and Reconstruction Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers in multiple domains have explored the idea of jointly optimizing both the sensing and reconstruction parts end-to-end on training data, thus allowing for improved performance compared to separate optimization [1,22,28]. In this paper, we build on this idea and propose a method of jointly optimizing sensing and reconstruction in CS-FM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%