Learning About Computers: An Analysis of Information Search and Technology Choice

Abstract

We estimate a dynamic model of how consumers learn about and choose between different brands of personal computers (PCs). To estimate the model, we use a panel data set that contains the search and purchase behavior of a set of consumers who were in the market for a PC. The data includes the information sources visited each period, search durations, as well as measures of price expectations and stated attitudes toward the alternatives during the search process. Our model extends recent work on estimation of Bayesian learning models of consumer choice behavior in environments characterized by uncertainty by estimating a model of active learning—i.e., a model in which consumers make optimal sequential decisions about how much information to gather prior to making a purchase. Also, following the suggestion of Manski (2003), we use our data on price expectations to model consumers’ price expectation process, and, following the suggestion of McFadden (1989a), we incorporate the stated brand quality information into our likelihood function, rather than modeling only revealed preference data. Our analysis sheds light on how consumer forward-looking price expectations and the process of learning about quality influence the consumer choice process. A key finding is that estimates of dynamic price elasticities of demand exceed estimates that ignore the expectations effect by roughly 50%. This occurs because our estimated expectations formation process implies that consumers expect mean reversion in price changes. This enhances the impact of a temporary price cut. Finally, while our work focuses specifically on the PC market, the modeling approach we develop here may be useful for studying a wide range of high-tech, high-involvement durable goods markets where active learning is important. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005brand choice models, technology choice, decision-making under uncertainty, information search, consumer expectations, dynamic programming,

The Joint Sales Impact of Frequency Reward and Customer Tier Components of Loyalty Programs

“…This sample size is similar to other research using dynamic models (Erdem, Keane, and Sun. 2008;Erdem, Keane, Oncu, and Strebel 2005;Osborne 2007) the one-year time frame used in the estimation. In our data, about 98% of customers cashed in at least once during the two-year period; 72% cashed in exactly once.…”

Consumer Search Behavior and Its Effect on Markets

“…Models of limited information processing capability of Shugan (1980), andde Palma et al (1994) can also be classified into this general stream. More recent work has integrated models of search and learning into empirical work (e.g., Erdem et al, 2005). While the above work mainly considers search prior to purchase, search through experience is also important, especially for packaged goods.…”

Learning from Experience, Simply

“…Some models focus on myopic consumers with Bayesian learning (e.g., Narayanan et al 2005;Mehta et al 2008;Chintagunta et al 2009;Narayanan and Manchanda 2009;Ching andIshihara 2010, 2012), while others explicitly model forward-looking consumers (e.g., Ackerberg 2003;Crawford and Shum 2005;Erdem et al 2005Erdem et al , 2008. The computational complexity of forward-looking learning has been one of the reasons that some applications assume myopic learning.…”