2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/y6xhj
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning About Germs in a Global Pandemic: Children’s Knowledge and Avoidance of Contagious Illness Before and After COVID-19

Abstract: The present research investigates how a global pandemic may be affecting children’s understanding of contagion. In Study 1, 130 parents (85.4% White, 6.9% Hispanic, 3.8% Asian, 3.8% Black) of children ages 3-9 described discussions surrounding contagion pre- and post-pandemic. Content of these discussions focused on risks and preventative behaviors rather than causal mechanisms of contagion. In Study 2, US children tested during the pandemic (ages 4-7, N=60, 51.7% males) were compared to a sample tested before… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since March of 2020, there has been an outpouring of psychological research on COVID-19. Although much of this work is not directly relevant to causal theories (e.g., focusing instead on behavioral consequences of quarantining, remote schooling, and mask-wearing), studies that have examined beliefs about viral transmission suggest that adults in the U.S. hold a mixture of accurate and inaccurate beliefs, and that their beliefs relate to perceptions of risk, health-related decision-making, and interest in being vaccinated (see DeJesus et al, 2021 ; Leotti et al, 2021 , for research on children’s beliefs). For example, in a sample of U.S. residents tested in October/November of 2020, Murray et al (2021) assessed people’s knowledge about germs, asking them to judge as true or false a range of statements either consistent with scientific theory (e.g., “Being depressed can make a person sick”; “Germs enter the body through the eyes”) or inconsistent with scientific theory but consistent with naïve theory (e.g., “Water kills germs”; “Vitamins and minerals can cure viruses”).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since March of 2020, there has been an outpouring of psychological research on COVID-19. Although much of this work is not directly relevant to causal theories (e.g., focusing instead on behavioral consequences of quarantining, remote schooling, and mask-wearing), studies that have examined beliefs about viral transmission suggest that adults in the U.S. hold a mixture of accurate and inaccurate beliefs, and that their beliefs relate to perceptions of risk, health-related decision-making, and interest in being vaccinated (see DeJesus et al, 2021 ; Leotti et al, 2021 , for research on children’s beliefs). For example, in a sample of U.S. residents tested in October/November of 2020, Murray et al (2021) assessed people’s knowledge about germs, asking them to judge as true or false a range of statements either consistent with scientific theory (e.g., “Being depressed can make a person sick”; “Germs enter the body through the eyes”) or inconsistent with scientific theory but consistent with naïve theory (e.g., “Water kills germs”; “Vitamins and minerals can cure viruses”).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%