2019
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2019.2919201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Adaptive Discriminative Correlation Filters via Temporal Consistency Preserving Spatial Feature Selection for Robust Visual Object Tracking

Abstract: With efficient appearance learning models, Discriminative Correlation Filter (DCF) has been proven to be very successful in recent video object tracking benchmarks and competitions. However, the existing DCF paradigm suffers from two major issues, i.e., spatial boundary effect and temporal filter degradation. To mitigate these challenges, we propose a new DCF-based tracking method. The key innovations of the proposed method include adaptive spatial feature selection and temporal consistent constraints, with wh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
211
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
211
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common characterisation of the above approaches is that they are all based on a fixed spatial regularisation pattern, for example, a predefined mask or weighting function. To achieve adaptive spatial regularisation, LADCF [83] embeds dynamic spatial feature selection in the filter learning stage. Thanks to this innovation it has achieved the best results in the public VOT2018 dataset [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common characterisation of the above approaches is that they are all based on a fixed spatial regularisation pattern, for example, a predefined mask or weighting function. To achieve adaptive spatial regularisation, LADCF [83] embeds dynamic spatial feature selection in the filter learning stage. Thanks to this innovation it has achieved the best results in the public VOT2018 dataset [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the proposed method on several wellknown benchmarks, including OTB2013/OTB2015 [81,82], VOT2017/VOT2018 [33,34] and TrackingNet Test dataset [55], and compared it with a number of state-of-theart trackers, such as VITAL [68], MetaT [58], ECO [13], MCPF [89], CREST [67], BACF [31], CFNet [73], CACF [54], ACFN [11], CSRDCF [49], C-COT [51], Staple [4], SiamFC [5], SRDCF [15], KCF [27], SAMF [41], DSST [16] and other advanced trackers in VOT challenges, i.e., CFCF [23], CFWCR [25], LSART [69], UPDT [6], SiamRPN [91], MFT [34] and LADCF [83].…”
Section: Implementation and Evaluation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although SATIN ranks the 15th with an EAO score of 0.294 in the baseline experiment, it achieves a third-best performance with the EAO score of 0.289 in the real-time experiment. Compared with the LADCF tracker [71], which delivers the best EAO score of 0.389 in the baseline experiment, SATIN outperforms it by 22.3% in the real-time experiment. SiamRPN [25] obtains the best EAO score of 0.383 in the real-time experiment 2 .…”
Section: Experiments On Votmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The entire set of circulant shifts satisfies the convolution theorem, simplifying the computation via element-wise multiplication and division in the frequency space, rather than calculating the product or inverse of training matrices. These advantages are further strengthened by incorporating additional regularisations and constraints [11,12]. Apart from the improvements achieved by sophisticated mathematical formulations, advanced DCF trackers tend to employ powerful deep CNN features for boosting the performance [13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%