2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58515-4_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Analytics and Its Paternalistic Influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pushing forward with learning analytics without considering student privacy preferences-or ignoring such preferences all together-is foolhardy and morally suspect. I will not go as far to say that privacy-lite learning analytics initiatives are meant to do harm, in fact they are most likely well-intentioned but misplaced paternalistic actions (Jones, 2017). However, not considering student privacy preferences runs counter to norms of respecting individual autonomy and expressions thereof in choice making.…”
Section: The Emerging Student Voicementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pushing forward with learning analytics without considering student privacy preferences-or ignoring such preferences all together-is foolhardy and morally suspect. I will not go as far to say that privacy-lite learning analytics initiatives are meant to do harm, in fact they are most likely well-intentioned but misplaced paternalistic actions (Jones, 2017). However, not considering student privacy preferences runs counter to norms of respecting individual autonomy and expressions thereof in choice making.…”
Section: The Emerging Student Voicementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Extant arguments suggest that learning analytics and the algorithms that nudge students towards particular courses and programs and away from others create student autonomy issues (Jones, 2017;Rubel & Jones, 2016). The predictive models that score students also raise autonomy concerns, but they also bring to light digital redlining issues when such scores bias instructors in their allocation of time and resources for particular students (Gilliard & Culik, 2016).…”
Section: Data Ethics and Privacy Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%