2016
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and assessment with images: A view of cognitive load through the lens of cerebral blood flow

Abstract: is the senior instructional designer and coordinator of digital learning and simulation at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario. His research focuses is on educational technology and the impact on the learner and performance. He has taught graduated level courses in the field of Educational Technology focusing on 21st century teaching and learning (Email: Jay.Loftus@schulich.uwo.ca). Michele Jacobsen PhD is associate dean of graduate programs in education and a profe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also some suggestion in the cognitive psychology literature that spatial reasoning ability should be selected for in future physicians for specialties broadly, not just radiology (Hegarty et al, ). These findings in the medical literature are supported by generally positive associations found in anatomy literature as well (Rochford, ; Garg et al, ; Guillot et al, ; Lufler et al, ; Sweeney et al, ), and these concepts are supported by recent physiologic findings of brain perfusion changes during spatial tasks (Loftus et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…There is also some suggestion in the cognitive psychology literature that spatial reasoning ability should be selected for in future physicians for specialties broadly, not just radiology (Hegarty et al, ). These findings in the medical literature are supported by generally positive associations found in anatomy literature as well (Rochford, ; Garg et al, ; Guillot et al, ; Lufler et al, ; Sweeney et al, ), and these concepts are supported by recent physiologic findings of brain perfusion changes during spatial tasks (Loftus et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Even though the emerging neuroeducation seemed to be received with enthusiasm, it was not without controversy and skepticism (Cuthbert, 2015) and this "gap" has always been present as a maximum representative of the distance between sciences, neurosciences, and education (Hardiman et al, 2012;Howard-Jones, 2014). Likewise, specific neuroimaging technology uses have been labeled as premature for educational research (Loftus et al, 2017). For example, Bruer (1999) has described this 30-year path almost from the beginning.…”
Section: Introduction a Brief History Of The Neuromythsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental imagery has been shown to significantly improve the acquisition and execution of technical skills (Epstein, 1980; Driskell et al, 1994; Bohan et al, 1999), has been implicated as important in surgical skills development (Bathalon et al, 2005; Arora et al, 2011) as well as in the development of palpation skills (Esteves and Spence, 2013). Similarly, spatial ability, its importance, and its apparent malleability as a trait (Baenninger and Newcombe, 1989; Hoyek et al, 2009; Lufler et al, 2012) have been widely discussed within the anatomy education literature (e.g., Garg et al, 2001, 2002; Guillot et al, 2007; Hegarty et al, 2008; Lufler et al, 2012; Vorstenbosch et al, 2013; Nguyen et al, 2014; Sweeney et al, 2014; Berney et al, 2015; Delisser and Carwardine, 2017; Gutierrez et al, 2017; Loftus et al, 2017). Given the indication in the current study that haptic and spatial skills are integral to the application of anatomical knowledge in clinical practice, recent efforts within anatomy education to advance development of such skills (e.g., Hegarty et al, 2008; Gutierrez et al, 2017; Roach et al, 2018; Bogomolova et al, 2020) appear to be well grounded and conceived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%