2019
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and flexibility for water supply infrastructure planning under groundwater resource uncertainty

Abstract: Water supply infrastructure planning in groundwater-dependent regions is often challenged by uncertainty in future groundwater resource availability. Many major aquifer systems face long-term water table decline due to unsustainable withdrawals. However, many regions, especially those in the developing world, have a scarcity of groundwater data. This creates large uncertainties in groundwater resource predictions and decisions about whether to develop alternative supply sources. Developing infrastructure too s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adherence to all of the minimum provisions described in this paper is particularly crucial to reduce the risk of deleterious impacts to these systems. Moreover, precaution would dictate that if new groundwater uses are allowed, they be smaller from the outset and then monitored to affirm no unacceptable impact (Fletcher et al 2019) before allowing use to ratchet up, rather than approving larger initial uses based on the supposition they could be curtailed later if need be. Such an approach would also provide an opportunity to test and verify the adequacy of the monitoring regime and adaptive management mechanisms necessary to achieve sustainability goals, while also reducing the risk of over-building water infrastructure and incurring extra implementation costs (Fletcher et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adherence to all of the minimum provisions described in this paper is particularly crucial to reduce the risk of deleterious impacts to these systems. Moreover, precaution would dictate that if new groundwater uses are allowed, they be smaller from the outset and then monitored to affirm no unacceptable impact (Fletcher et al 2019) before allowing use to ratchet up, rather than approving larger initial uses based on the supposition they could be curtailed later if need be. Such an approach would also provide an opportunity to test and verify the adequacy of the monitoring regime and adaptive management mechanisms necessary to achieve sustainability goals, while also reducing the risk of over-building water infrastructure and incurring extra implementation costs (Fletcher et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarity about who is responsible for monitoring, reporting, and implementation costs is key, and should include what funding sources or mechanisms will be used. Verification that funds are available, have been set aside, or are accounted for in bonding mechanisms, can increase incentives and certainty in the implementation of sustainable groundwater management (Cody et al 2015;Newman et al 2018;Fletcher et al 2019). Some mechanisms for generating funds include administrative, water use, or replenishment fees for water districts (Newman et al 2018) as well as seeking assistance from federal programs like the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (Cody et al 2015).…”
Section: Minimum Provision 7: Secure Adequate Funding and Capacity For Project Planning Implementation Monitoring And Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People have also recognized the potential of model emulators to aid in the context of environmental decision-making to speed scenario testing (Carnevale et al, 2012). In integrated assessment models, which include interdependent submodels of environmental and social systems, emulators can help reduce computational barriers in model coupling and characterize systems' uncertainty (Fletcher et al, 2019;Haasnoot et al, 2014;Little et al, 2019).…”
Section: Background 21 Emulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful application and widespread use of MODFLOW have made this model a benchmark approach to simulate groundwater systems (e.g., Guiguer & Franz 1996). So far, MODFLOW has been applied in various case studies such as stream depletion simulation of the aquifer (Ou et al 2016;Minderhoud et al 2017;Fletcher et al 2019), calibration of hydrodynamic components (Xu et al 2017), evaluation of the interaction effects of aquifer recharge and evapotranspiration (Maquin et al 2017), simulation of drawdown in the inclined wells (Batu 2015), assessment of aquifer vulnerability (Pacheco et al 2018), flood propagation and infiltration (Li et al 2019), among others. However, the MODFLOW model can perform best in regular geometry with proper grid flexibility, whereas, for real-world applications with irregular geometry, this approach may poorly perform due to its governing flow approximation which leads to structural uncertainty in simulation (e.g., Strack 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%