Learning and Innovation in Agriculture and Rural Development: The Use of the Concepts of Boundary Work and Boundary Objects

Abstract

Purpose: The paper explores the role of boundary work and boundary objects in enhancing learning and innovation processes in hybrid multi-actor networks for sustainable agriculture ({LINSA}).Design/Methodology/Approach: Boundary work in {LINSA} is analysed on the basis of six case studies carried out in {SOLINSA} project under a common methodology. In developing typologies of boundary work and objects, a grounded approach is used.Findings: {LINSA} analysis demonstrates the dynamic character, diverse forms and multiple functions of boundary work and objects in three domains: learning, innovation, and sustainability. Addressing specific types of goals and actors leads to specific types of boundary work and boundary objects. Context-appropriate boundary work allows aligning differing actor attitudes, gaining increased external support, and developing {LINSA}. The concepts of boundary work and boundary objects are relevant in a broad range of divergent {LINSA} settings. Boundary work has its limitations, but its facilitation supports reaching {LINSA} goals.Practical Implications: The paper proposes recognising context-appropriate forms of boundary work and skilful use of emerging boundary objects to both promote internal consolidation of {LINSA} and effective external communication to foster learning and innovation for sustainability.Originality/Value: The paper provides insights into the forms, dynamic and outcomes of boundary work in {LINSA} in three key domains: developing shared knowledge base, co-producing innovation and negotiating sustainability

Doing water research differently for innovation in regional water productivity in Australia

“…Using the concept of 'innovation systems' , rather than that of 'research priority setting' , as our starting point for this research-led collaboration, guided us to consider the complexity and diversity of the range of interests and objectives in water resources management, and who might need to be involved to address the priorities in innovation identified in the Blueprint. The concept of 'innovation systems' functioned as a so-called 'boundary object' , a guiding device to which multiple stakeholders can connect and over which they can develop a meaningful dialogue, as has also been observed elsewhere Nicolini, Mengis, and Swan 2012;Tisenkopfs et al 2015). However, while the discourse of 'innovation systems' provided a boundary object to enhance the collaboration, the process itself did not collaboratively produce clear designs (e.g.…”

Governance challenges of cocoa partnership projects in Indonesia: seeking synergy in multi-stakeholder arrangements for sustainable agriculture

“…Their role can therefore be conceived as boundary workers as they transfer and translate knowledge from Swisscontact to the farmers (McMillan 2011;Tisenkopfs et al 2015). Their involvement seems an adequate strategy from the NGO to help them in training farmers in the field schools.…”

Examining Innovation for Sustainability from the Bottom Up: An Analysis of the Permaculture Community in England

“…; Tisenkopfs et al . ). We know from this work that forms of knowledge, learning and practice are associated with specific groups or communities with social bonds strengthened through a process of sharing the same knowledge, values, practices and repertoires (Ingram and Maye ).…”

“…; Esparcia ; Hinrichs ; Ingram, ; Tisenkopfs et al . ). Adams and Hess (, p. 1) note that ‘innovation occurs when a new idea (or combination of old ideas) forms a different way of thinking or interacting’.…”

“…I nnovation has become something of a buzzword in recent years, especially within food and rural and regional development policy (Bock 2012;Neumeier 2012;Kirwan et al 2013;Esparcia 2014;Hinrichs 2014;Ingram, 2015;Tisenkopfs et al 2015). Adams and Hess (2008, p. 1) note that 'innovation occurs when a new idea (or combination of old ideas) forms a different way of thinking or interacting'.…”