2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.010139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning assistant approaches to teaching computational physics problems in a problem-based learning course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For students to appreciate the role of computation in their discipline and meaningfully engage with computational practices during their program, they should meet the disciplinary relevant practices in authentic disciplinary contexts [3] [5]. In addition, if students only engage with computational practices in special laboratories or homework projects, they may perceive that computational practices are not practices of their disciplinary repertoire, and will not place sufficient value on them [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For students to appreciate the role of computation in their discipline and meaningfully engage with computational practices during their program, they should meet the disciplinary relevant practices in authentic disciplinary contexts [3] [5]. In addition, if students only engage with computational practices in special laboratories or homework projects, they may perceive that computational practices are not practices of their disciplinary repertoire, and will not place sufficient value on them [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From their study, they created a taxonomy of computational thinking and practices divided into four main categories: Data Practices; Modeling and Simulation Practices; Computational Problem Solving Practices; and, Systems Thinking Practices. This taxonomy has been used to code STEM professional' interviews about how they use computational thinking in their work [3], [4], [5], [6] . While we acknowledge that this taxonomy might not be comprehensive [9], for the purpose of this study it suited our needs as a guide for determining what counts as computational thinking and practices within the College of Science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected the Weller et al framework because it had these operationalized markers and because our context similarly used group-based learning and MWPs, and covered similar introductory physics content. Our study took place in a course called Electricity and Magnetism Projects and Practices in Physics (EMP-Cubed), which is a second semester, calculus-based, introductory physics classroom at a large R1 university that integrates computation throughout the curriculum, including the in-class activities, online notes, homework, and exams [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The EMP-Cubed course was fundamental as a basis setting for the research that lead to the design of the Weller et al framework.…”
Section: Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About one third of the in class problems are MWP computation problems. During class periods, students work with their groups to add or edit the given code rather than writing a program from scratch [21,22,24,28].…”
Section: Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the beginning, we must begin to remember concepts and laws. Recently, Pawlak et al (2020) introduced in detail a learning assistant approach to teaching computational physics problems (Pawlak et al, 2020).…”
Section: Physics Is Associated With Human Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%