2024
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2023.3246985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning-Based Multi-UAV Flocking Control With Limited Visual Field and Instinctive Repulsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the data, as presented in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 12, reveals a comparative evaluation of the average and standard deviation of the performance metrics across different methods. A noteworthy observation from the analysis is that our proposed method significantly surpasses the performance metrics of the other three benchmark algorithms (sac [36], ppo [37], and ddpg [38]), highlighting the superior efficacy of our method over alternative strategies. This superior performance is not merely confined to a comparison with benchmark algorithms, but it extends to a close alignment with the metrics directed by the expert policy, underscoring the potent capability of imitation learning within this framework.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis of the data, as presented in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 12, reveals a comparative evaluation of the average and standard deviation of the performance metrics across different methods. A noteworthy observation from the analysis is that our proposed method significantly surpasses the performance metrics of the other three benchmark algorithms (sac [36], ppo [37], and ddpg [38]), highlighting the superior efficacy of our method over alternative strategies. This superior performance is not merely confined to a comparison with benchmark algorithms, but it extends to a close alignment with the metrics directed by the expert policy, underscoring the potent capability of imitation learning within this framework.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In order to compare the performance difference between our method and other benchmark algorithms, we define the performance metrics and conduct a relevant analysis. The benchmark algorithms are those such as sac [36], ppo [37], and ddpg [38]. We assessed the performance of the five policies in the pre-established scenario, ensuring that the environmental settings remained consistent with those during training.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation