2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccad.2015.7372659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning-based power modeling of system-level black-box IPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hardware realization of the signal monitoring in [14] and [19] led to an LUT resource overhead of 7% and 9% in terms of the tested applications, respectively, as well as incurred a workload of 5% of CPU time. Furthermore, as studied in [15] and [16], the power behaviors of complex arithmetic units are potentially non-linear. As a consequence, the up-to-date finegrained linear power model exhibits intrinsic restrictions on achieving high accuracy when non-linear power behaviors are discovered with the increasing training size.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hardware realization of the signal monitoring in [14] and [19] led to an LUT resource overhead of 7% and 9% in terms of the tested applications, respectively, as well as incurred a workload of 5% of CPU time. Furthermore, as studied in [15] and [16], the power behaviors of complex arithmetic units are potentially non-linear. As a consequence, the up-to-date finegrained linear power model exhibits intrinsic restrictions on achieving high accuracy when non-linear power behaviors are discovered with the increasing training size.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the above considerations, we aim to establish an accurate, fine-grained and light-weight dynamic power monitoring scheme on FPGAs. We note that the widely deployed linear power model [13], [14] is unable to adapt itself well to non-linear power behaviors of complex arithmetic units [15], [16]. We therefore develop a novel non-linear decision-tree-based power model, leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work [8], [9] extracted the toggle rate of a small set of internal signals and built the model in embedded processors, resulting in the LUT resource overhead of 7% in [8] and 9% in [9] for their tested applications, as well as around 5% CPU time for both of these two work. Furthermore, as studied in [10], [11], power behaviors of complex arithmetic units are generally non-linear. Hence, the linear model exhibits intrinsic restriction in accuracy enhancement when non-linear power patterns increase with the growing sample size, which is known as the underfitting problem in machine learning theory.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average MAE percentage is 4.36% for our proposed decision tree model whereas the linear regression indicates an average error of 17.31%. From Table II, we can see that the advantages of decision tree over linear model is larger for DSP-based and hybrid designs, because the LUTs are intrinsically better to be fitted in the linear regression model while the DSPs are inclined to have non-linear power patterns, as reported in [10], [11] that the complex arithmetic units generally exhibit non-linear power behaviors.…”
Section: A Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we propose HL-Pow, a learning-based power modeling framework for HLS designs. Our modeling framework features wide applicability and high efficiency compared with state-of-the-art works [10]- [13]. First of all, HL-Pow offers a modeling strategy with high generalization ability so that various designs can use one well developed model for power prediction without the need of model reconstruction when targeting the same FPGA platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%