2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2018.8422661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning-Based Task Offloading for Vehicular Cloud Computing Systems

Abstract: Vehicular cloud computing (VCC) is proposed to effectively utilize and share the computing and storage resources on vehicles. However, due to the mobility of vehicles, the network topology, the wireless channel states and the available computing resources vary rapidly and are difficult to predict. In this work, we develop a learning-based task offloading framework using the multi-armed bandit (MAB) theory, which enables vehicles to learn the potential task offloading performance of its neighboring vehicles wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, we solve the task replication problem within a MAB framework, which is a general learning framework and does not rely on additional assumptions on traffic model or scheduling process. The most related work is probably [13] where the authors use the MAB framework to help make task offloading decision.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, we solve the task replication problem within a MAB framework, which is a general learning framework and does not rely on additional assumptions on traffic model or scheduling process. The most related work is probably [13] where the authors use the MAB framework to help make task offloading decision.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While [13] only considers a task offloading problem, we consider both task offloading and task replication for VCC systems. More importantly, the MAB algorithm proposed in [13] only works with a finite arm set. By contrast, the proposed CC-MAB framework is able to learn with an infinitely large arm set which fits the VCC systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, authors consider that the number of learning trials is large enough compared to the number of BSs whose performances need to be learnt. Focusing on a vehicular edge computing scenario instead, authors in [7] consider the problem of task offloading from one vehicle to neighboring serving vehicles (SeVs) with the goal of minimizing the overall delay. Similar to [4], a volatile MAB approach is used to deal with the SeVs' volatility, in addition to including loadawareness in the selection decision process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, they consider a limited user mobility ( [4], [5], [6]) and as such, they do not address the problems that may arise from longer mobility durations, such as the continuously-changing set of FNs. Second, they consider scenarios with a limited number of FNs, where the user can have enough time to learn the best one among them ( [7], [8]), which may not always be the case. In fact, as will be shown in our collected data, a user usually has to learn the performances of a high number of FNs in a very short time frame, since the set of nearby FNs changes due to mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative way is to offload tasks in a distributed manner, i.e., each TaV makes task offloading decisions individually [14]. In this case, TaV may not be able to obtain the global state information of channel states and computation loads of all available SeVs, which can be learned while offloading tasks based on multi-armed bandit (MAB) theory, as shown in our previous work [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%