2013
DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2012.709876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Benefits of Using 2D Versus 3D Maps: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Niedomsyl et al [15] conducted a study on the learning benefits of using 2D versus 3D maps, and also concluded that each type of representation offers strengths and weaknesses depending on the purpose sought. Ultimately, they claimed that the current body of research on the overall usefulness of 3D maps versus 2D maps is inconclusive.…”
Section: Background: 2d Against 3d Representations Of the Landformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Niedomsyl et al [15] conducted a study on the learning benefits of using 2D versus 3D maps, and also concluded that each type of representation offers strengths and weaknesses depending on the purpose sought. Ultimately, they claimed that the current body of research on the overall usefulness of 3D maps versus 2D maps is inconclusive.…”
Section: Background: 2d Against 3d Representations Of the Landformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students come into contact with 3D maps and landscape representations in numerous ways [15] and can visualize the relief through accessible popular applications such as Google Maps, which offers immense potential for the representation of landforms. Further, 3D technologies such as Augmented Reality (AR) may support teaching, although this technology also presents some limitations for its implementation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…studied differences of suitability of 2D and 3D maps for planning mountain hikes. Niedomysl et al (2013) compared static maps (2D and 3D) in terms of their use in a geographic education process. Rautenbach et al (2014) evaluated and compared 2D maps, 3D non-photorealistic landscapes and 3D realistic city models for urban planning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping techniques currently used in landscape and seascape ecology utilize the two-dimensional (2D) aspect because this is simpler to generate and requires less data than ones having a three-dimensional (3D) aspect. The creation of 3D maps is, however, very widespread in terrestrial environmental studies, especially in programs that have an educational or informative aim (Niedomysl et al, 2013;Schobesberger and Patterson, 2008). Besides the advantages and inconvenience of visual interpretations (Popelka and Brychtova, 2013), 3D maps provide different results compared to the 2D ones according to the topography of the site studied.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%