Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures (CAADFutures) 2007 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6528-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning by Doing in the Age of Design Computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the prevalence of digital fabrication technology in the design discipline, Özkar suggested that the means for teaching design should be altered in parallel to the tools [22]. This demands a different approach to teaching which integrates design thinking with techniques of digital fabrication technology [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the prevalence of digital fabrication technology in the design discipline, Özkar suggested that the means for teaching design should be altered in parallel to the tools [22]. This demands a different approach to teaching which integrates design thinking with techniques of digital fabrication technology [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one end of the spectrum, there are those exploring the incorporation of information technologies, computer based training (CBT) and virtual learning environments (VLE) into the design studio in various degrees (Mark et al 2001(Mark et al , 2003, and others concentrating on the direct appropriation of 2D and 3D CAD technologies in basic design courses (Unver 2006). At the other pole, especially predominant in architectural circles, is an inclination towards combining the rather more analogous tools and concepts of basic design and design thinking with their digital complements in design computation ( € Ozkar 2005( € Ozkar , 2007( € Ozkar , 2011)a path much closer to the one we have followed throughout. In terms of scale, the first pole is marked by an effort to contain an entire undergraduate curriculum while the other revolves around specific problems and concepts in design reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important part of the challenge towards this aim is the integration of existing studio‐based model of design education, which is rooted in the tradition of ‘learning by doing’ through hands‐on experimentation and production using traditional tools and materials, with the logic and notions of contemporary tools and technologies on the side of design computing and inquiry (Özkar , ). Typically, in design curricula, the development of these competencies is initiated and carried out separately in different semesters of the programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kvan et al [59] thought that students should know how to use software tools and have some knowledge of programming and mathematics to be able to control CNC processes and create controls appropriate to the material being machined. Özkar [62] observed that computerized tools and computational thinking could be introduced into architectural design education at a fundamental level in the first undergraduate year, for example, by initially teaching elementary design skills to first-year architecture students and then basic notions of computation. Woodbury [63] argued that designers needed to extend their knowledge in order to understand the diversity and structure of the mathematical toolbox in a parametric design environment.…”
Section: Colormentioning
confidence: 99%