2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.02009
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning by Sorting: Self-supervised Learning with Group Ordering Constraints

Abstract: Contrastive learning has become a prominent ingredient in learning representations from unlabeled data. However, existing methods primarily consider pairwise relations. This paper proposes a new approach towards selfsupervised contrastive learning based on Group Ordering Constraints (GroCo). The GroCo loss leverages the idea of comparing groups of positive and negative images instead of pairs of images. Building on the recent success of differentiable sorting algorithms, group ordering constraints enforce that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other techniques, such as swapping assignments across views (SwAVs), correlate views to consistent clusters between positive pairs by clustering representations into a shared set of prototypes [44,[46][47][48]. The entropy-regularized optimal transport strategy is also used in the same context to move representations between clusters in a manner that prevents them from collapsing into one another [46,[49][50][51][52][53]. Finally, the cross-entropy between the optimal tasks in one branch and the anticipated distribution in the other is minimized by the loss.…”
Section: Contrastive Ssl Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques, such as swapping assignments across views (SwAVs), correlate views to consistent clusters between positive pairs by clustering representations into a shared set of prototypes [44,[46][47][48]. The entropy-regularized optimal transport strategy is also used in the same context to move representations between clusters in a manner that prevents them from collapsing into one another [46,[49][50][51][52][53]. Finally, the cross-entropy between the optimal tasks in one branch and the anticipated distribution in the other is minimized by the loss.…”
Section: Contrastive Ssl Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%