2018
DOI: 10.1101/364034
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning cellular morphology with neural networks

Abstract: Reconstruction and annotation of volume electron microscopy data sets of brain tissue is challenging, but can reveal invaluable information about neuronal circuits. Significant progress has recently been made in automated neuron reconstruction, as well as automated detection of synapses. However, methods for automating the morphological analysis of nanometer-resolution reconstructions are less established, despite their diverse application possibilities. Here, we introduce cellular morphology neural networks (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, multiple rounds of manual segmentation and detailed quality control by experienced astrocyte biologists were required to find complete sets of connected astrocytic branches in our reference volumes (see Methods). Indeed, segmentation of nanoscopic branches of astrocytes are an acknowledged challenge in the field (Rusakov, 2015), and in fact, special attention must be paid to removing segmenting errors caused by the presence of astrocytes in current state-of-the-art automated segmentation approaches (Januszewski et al, 2018;Schubert et al, 2019). While crowdsourcing astrocytic segmentation followed by stringent quality control may be a viable alternative (Arganda-Carreras et al, 2015), astrocyte-specific auto-segmentation strategies are likely needed to reconstruct fine astrocytic nanostructure for complete cells and fully integrate astrocytes into the pursuit of saturated reconstructions and connectomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, multiple rounds of manual segmentation and detailed quality control by experienced astrocyte biologists were required to find complete sets of connected astrocytic branches in our reference volumes (see Methods). Indeed, segmentation of nanoscopic branches of astrocytes are an acknowledged challenge in the field (Rusakov, 2015), and in fact, special attention must be paid to removing segmenting errors caused by the presence of astrocytes in current state-of-the-art automated segmentation approaches (Januszewski et al, 2018;Schubert et al, 2019). While crowdsourcing astrocytic segmentation followed by stringent quality control may be a viable alternative (Arganda-Carreras et al, 2015), astrocyte-specific auto-segmentation strategies are likely needed to reconstruct fine astrocytic nanostructure for complete cells and fully integrate astrocytes into the pursuit of saturated reconstructions and connectomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the near future, VFB will ingest multiple large connectomics datasets with variable coverage and accuracy of neuron type annotation. BLAST-like algorithms, in the short-term NBLAST for morphology, but longer term supplemented by CBLAST (Scheffer et al, 2020) for connectivity and potentially methods that use subcellular features (Schubert et al, 2019;Zinchenko et al, 2022), will be critical to help users to interpret this data by facilitating prediction and assignment of neuron types. For example, a user finding paths between untyped neurons from FlyWire using our circuit browsing tool will be able to use NBLAST to find predicted types for neurons in the circuit, where these exist in other reference data sets.…”
Section: Supporting Comparative Connectomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%