2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42484-022-00073-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning classical readout quantum PUFs based on single-qubit gates

Abstract: Physical unclonable functions (PUFs) have been proposed as a way to identify and authenticate electronic devices. Recently, several ideas have been presented to that aim to achieve the same for quantum devices. Some of these constructions apply single-qubit gates in order to provide a secure fingerprint of the quantum device. In this work, we formalize the class of classical readout quantum PUFs (CR-QPUFs) using the statistical query (SQ) model and explicitly show insufficient security for CR-QPUFs based on si… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QPUFs [26][27][28] are hardware devices characterized by intrinsic randomness, rendering them unique and unclonable. They can be viewed as black boxes where the assumption of uniqueness stems from the idea that unpredictable manufacturing variations create devices whose behavior is easier to replicate through querying and collecting challenge-response (input-output) pairs rather than understanding the underlying variations, which might require destructive methods.…”
Section: Qpufmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QPUFs [26][27][28] are hardware devices characterized by intrinsic randomness, rendering them unique and unclonable. They can be viewed as black boxes where the assumption of uniqueness stems from the idea that unpredictable manufacturing variations create devices whose behavior is easier to replicate through querying and collecting challenge-response (input-output) pairs rather than understanding the underlying variations, which might require destructive methods.…”
Section: Qpufmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers could also refer to [10] for a theoretical treatment of the topic. Furthermore, Pirnay et al [11] extend the idea in [9] to have multiple cycles of rotation gates instead of a single cycle, as shown in Figure 3. Following [10], Kumar et al [12] present an implementation via a regular and entangled configuration utilizing Pauli-X, Pauli-Z, and CZ gates, as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Quantum Physically Unclonable Functions (Qpufs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be multiple I stages; only two such stages shown here for brevity. [11] uses multiple R Y and R X stages with different rotation degrees; only two shown.…”
Section: Quantum Physically Unclonable Functions (Qpufs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers could also refer to [6] for a theoretical treatment of the topic. [7] extends the idea in [5] to have multiple cycles of rotation gates instead of a single cycle as shown in Figure 3. [8] presents yet another implementation via a regular and entangled configuration utilizing X, Z, and CZ gates as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Quantum Physically Unclonable Functions (Qpufs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QPUF implementation [7] uses multiple R Y and R X stages with different rotation degrees; only two shown.…”
Section: Quantum Physically Unclonable Functions (Qpufs)mentioning
confidence: 99%