2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2013.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Compact Binary Codes for Visual Tracking

Abstract: A key problem in visual tracking is to represent the appearance of an object in a way that is robust to visual changes. To attain this robustness, increasingly complex models are used to capture appearance variations. However, such models can be difficult to maintain accurately and efficiently. In this paper, we propose a visual tracker in which objects are represented by compact and discriminative binary codes. This representation can be processed very efficiently, and is capable of effectively fusing informa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single target visual tracking has long been attracting large amounts of research efforts [39]. It is impractical to enumerate all previous work, instead we sample some recent interests related to our work: i) linear representation with a dictionary, e.g., a set of basis vectors based on subspace learning [29,12] or least softthreshold squares linear regression [32], a series of raw pixel templates based on sparse coding [25,24,44,43,36] or non-sparse linear representation [22]; ii) collaboration of multiple tracking models, e.g., Interacting Markov Chain Monto Carlo (MCMC) based [17,18,19], local/global combination based [45]; iii) part-based models, e.g., fragments voting based [1,9,5], incorporating spatial constraints between the parts [42,37], alignment-pooling across the local patches [14]; iv) and the widely followed trackingby-detection (or discriminative) methods [6,7,20,2,8,21,31,45], which treat the tracking problem as a classification task. All these trackers adaptively update tracking models to accommodate the appearance changes and new information during tracking.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single target visual tracking has long been attracting large amounts of research efforts [39]. It is impractical to enumerate all previous work, instead we sample some recent interests related to our work: i) linear representation with a dictionary, e.g., a set of basis vectors based on subspace learning [29,12] or least softthreshold squares linear regression [32], a series of raw pixel templates based on sparse coding [25,24,44,43,36] or non-sparse linear representation [22]; ii) collaboration of multiple tracking models, e.g., Interacting Markov Chain Monto Carlo (MCMC) based [17,18,19], local/global combination based [45]; iii) part-based models, e.g., fragments voting based [1,9,5], incorporating spatial constraints between the parts [42,37], alignment-pooling across the local patches [14]; iv) and the widely followed trackingby-detection (or discriminative) methods [6,7,20,2,8,21,31,45], which treat the tracking problem as a classification task. All these trackers adaptively update tracking models to accommodate the appearance changes and new information during tracking.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caffe: An open source convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding [5] Authors: Y. Jia Description: Caffe provides transmission scientists and practitioners with a clean and modifiable framework for progressive deep learning algorithms and a set of reference models. The framework may be a BSD-licensed C++ library with Python and MATLAB bindings for coaching and deploying general purpose convolutional neural networks and alternative deep models expeditiously on artifact architectures.…”
Section: Paper Namementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [40], they develop a so-called correlation component manifold space learning (CCMSL) to learn a common feature space by capturing the correlations between the heterogeneous databases. Many attempts [25,21] were focusing on compacting such high quality floating-point descriptors for reducing computation time and memory usage as well as improving the matching efficiency. In those methods, the floating-point descriptor construction procedure is independent of the hash codes learning and still costs a massive amounts of time-consuming computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%