2015
DOI: 10.1080/03626784.2014.995063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning connected civics: Narratives, practices, infrastructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings reinforce existing models for curation (Andrews and McDougal, 2012;Mihailidis and Cohen, 2013), digital media literacy education (Alvermann, 2010;Hobbs, 2011;Rheingold, 2012aRheingold, , 2012b and connected learning (Ito, 2009;Ito et al, 2015), that collectively call for more relevant and effective means for engaging young people in digital media practice and reflection. The recommendations below advocate for a series of approaches to curation centered on building effective digital competencies for critical inquiry and expression in digital culture today.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The findings reinforce existing models for curation (Andrews and McDougal, 2012;Mihailidis and Cohen, 2013), digital media literacy education (Alvermann, 2010;Hobbs, 2011;Rheingold, 2012aRheingold, , 2012b and connected learning (Ito, 2009;Ito et al, 2015), that collectively call for more relevant and effective means for engaging young people in digital media practice and reflection. The recommendations below advocate for a series of approaches to curation centered on building effective digital competencies for critical inquiry and expression in digital culture today.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This framing highlights that learning is mediated through activity -actions, thoughts and emotions -that cannot be designed in advance, only indirectly influenced through design. In acknowledging the complex interplay of the social (Ito et al, 2015;Wenger, 1999), the material (Ingold, 2011;Lave & Wenger, 1991;Sørensen, 2009;) and the epistemic (Clark, 2010;Hutchins, 2014) in learning, and to focus design attention on those aspects of any learning situation that are open to alteration through design, ACAD offers a theoretical scaffold with four components (see Figure 1). The first three accommodate the designable aspects of the social, material, and conceptual dimensions of learning, and the fourth accommodates the emergent activity of learners, including acts of co-creation and co-configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using their mobile devices, students sustained these new relations and, by and large, recognized these relations as something “new,” we argue, transformative. Students did not merely learn about concepts like connected civics (Ito et al , ) and learning on‐the‐move (Taylor & Hall, ). They learned through being in new relations with a familiar place—embodying a connection to previous activist communities on campus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%