2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-008-0361-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning consistent, complete and compact sets of fuzzy rules in conjunctive normal form for regression problems

Abstract: When a flexible fuzzy rule structure such as those with antecedent in conjunctive normal form is used, the interpretability of the obtained fuzzy model is significantly improved. However, some important problems appear related to the interaction among this set of rules. Indeed, it is relatively easy to get inconsistencies, lack of completeness, redundancies, etc. Generally, these properties are ignored or mildly faced. This paper, however, focuses on the design of a multiobjective genetic algorithm that proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This random selection of examples maximises the diversity of the initial population whilst also ensures that each example fires at least one fuzzy rule. This mechanism ensures a proper covering over all the training sample [20] and also specifies a variable number of rules in the initial individuals. Hence, each fuzzy rule is initialised with an unordered set of fuzzy antecedents, one per input (i.e.…”
Section: Initialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This random selection of examples maximises the diversity of the initial population whilst also ensures that each example fires at least one fuzzy rule. This mechanism ensures a proper covering over all the training sample [20] and also specifies a variable number of rules in the initial individuals. Hence, each fuzzy rule is initialised with an unordered set of fuzzy antecedents, one per input (i.e.…”
Section: Initialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is only an overview of problems that may happen. Casillas et al identified more possible inconsistencies risen by Pittsburgh modeling [15]. We propose to use a Pittsburgh representation where each solution is a ruleset.…”
Section: Solution Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous years, various genetic learning approaches have been considered for creating GFRBCSs 22,[27][28][29][30][31] , each exhibiting different benefits and drawbacks. Here we concentrate on the so-called iterative rule learning (IRL) approach [29][30][31] , which is the methodology followed by the proposal of this paper.…”
Section: Genetic Fuzzy Rule-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%