2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2006.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning correlated equilibria in games with compact sets of strategies

Abstract: Hart and Schmeidler's extension of correlated equilibrium to games with infinite sets of strategies is studied. General properties of the set of correlated equilibria are described. It is shown that, just like for finite games, if all players play according to an appropriate regret-minimizing strategy then the empirical frequencies of play converge to the set of correlated equilibria whenever the strategy sets are convex and compact.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This guarantee rules out precisely the anomalous behavior described above. Stoltz and Lugosi (2007) generalize these results to convex games. Extending the framework of Greenwald and Jafari (2003) for matrix games, they define a continuum of regret measures called Φ-regret, as well as corresponding Φ-equilibria, for convex games.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This guarantee rules out precisely the anomalous behavior described above. Stoltz and Lugosi (2007) generalize these results to convex games. Extending the framework of Greenwald and Jafari (2003) for matrix games, they define a continuum of regret measures called Φ-regret, as well as corresponding Φ-equilibria, for convex games.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Of course, the players may well use these signals when making their strategic choices. To date, there are several efficient algorithms [8,14,15,3,4,23,24,2,25,13] that, in all games, converge fast to (approximate) correlated equilibria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, that finite noncooperative games with greater numbers of pure strategies at their players (three and more) are significantly hard to solve them [10], [37], [38]. Moreover, often an admissible player's action is described with a series of its continuous parameters, constituting thus an infinite (continuous) set of pure strategies [1], [6], [7], [12], [39], [40]. If this continuous set is compact then it is easy to find an isomorphic game to the initial one, that the set of every player's pure strategies would be Euclidean finite-dimensional subspace [6], [10], [12], [23], [41].…”
Section: Solving Noncooperative Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, often an admissible player's action is described with a series of its continuous parameters, constituting thus an infinite (continuous) set of pure strategies [1], [6], [7], [12], [39], [40]. If this continuous set is compact then it is easy to find an isomorphic game to the initial one, that the set of every player's pure strategies would be Euclidean finite-dimensional subspace [6], [10], [12], [23], [41]. Normally, the spoken subspace may be a unit cube of the appropriate dimension [6], [10], [11].…”
Section: Solving Noncooperative Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%