2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2015.2469286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Deep Representation for Face Alignment with Auxiliary Attributes

Abstract: Abstract-In this study, we show that landmark detection or face alignment task is not a single and independent problem. Instead, its robustness can be greatly improved with auxiliary information. Specifically, we jointly optimize landmark detection together with the recognition of heterogeneous but subtly correlated facial attributes, such as gender, expression, and appearance attributes. This is non-trivial since different attribute inference tasks have different learning difficulties and convergence rates. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
308
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
308
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CDSM reports [24], the third by SDM [23] and the bottom by TCDCN [28]. RLBF, SDM and TCDCN fail to handle profile or nearly profile faces, but FHM works well for all poses.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDSM reports [24], the third by SDM [23] and the bottom by TCDCN [28]. RLBF, SDM and TCDCN fail to handle profile or nearly profile faces, but FHM works well for all poses.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiments, we compared our methods with 12 state-of-the-art face alignment methods including FPLL (Zhu and Ramanan 2012), DRMF (Asthana et al 2013), RCPR (Burgos-Artizzu et al 2013), SDM (Xiong and la Torre 2013), GN-DPM (Tzimiropoulos and Pantic 2014), ESR (Cao et al 2012), LBF (Ren et al 2014), ERT (Kazemi and Sullivan 2014), CFSS (Zhu et al 2015), CFAN (Zhang et al 2014), BPCPR (Sun et al 2015) and TCDCN (Zhang et al 2016). Table 1 tabulates comparisons of the averaged errors of our method to those state-of-the-art methods, where the results were directly cropped from the original papers.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed method is also reminiscent of previously proposed deep learning methods for face alignment [43,55,47,61,63,62]. Sun et al [47] and Zhou et al [63] propose to use independent Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to perform coarse-to-fine shape searching.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%