2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2015.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning definite Horn formulas from closure queries

Abstract: A definite Horn theory is a set of n-dimensional Boolean vectors whose characteristic function is expressible as a definite Horn formula, that is, as conjunction of definite Horn clauses. The class of definite Horn theories is known to be learnable under different query learning settings, such as learning from membership and equivalence queries or learning from entailment. We propose yet a different type of query: the closure query. Closure queries are a natural extension of membership queries and also a varia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of implication logic as a foundational support for explanations benefits both from FCA's results as well as from the approximate nature of Horn's clauses in the face of counterfactual issues asked by explainee [80], which we will consider in a future work. However, our proposal is only a first proof of concept towards a formalization of the notions involved in AI-assisted explaining of events (or justification of decisions) of CS (always keeping in mind that a number of sophisticated AI-based systems are actually CS).…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of implication logic as a foundational support for explanations benefits both from FCA's results as well as from the approximate nature of Horn's clauses in the face of counterfactual issues asked by explainee [80], which we will consider in a future work. However, our proposal is only a first proof of concept towards a formalization of the notions involved in AI-assisted explaining of events (or justification of decisions) of CS (always keeping in mind that a number of sophisticated AI-based systems are actually CS).…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this bound is weaker than Theorem 4.4, its proof demonstrates that this property of irredundant PC formulas is a consequence of the known properties of closure operators and their representation using Horn formulas. See Guigues and Duquenne (1986), Arias, Balcázar, and Tîrnăucă (2017) for more information on the relationship between closure operators (or closure systems) and Horn formulas. In particular, a formula is a PC formula, if it represents in the sense specified below the semantic closure operator on the sets of literals which are subsets of a set of polynomial size.…”
Section: Implicational Dual Rail Encoding Of Pc Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Ĥ be a Horn envelope of a set V ⊆ 2 Φ . For computing Ĥ, we need the membership query be answered relative to V. Such a query can be simulated by several implication queries relative to V. One well-known (see, e.g., [11]) method to do this is presented in Theorem 1.…”
Section: Simulating Membership Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%