Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery &Amp; Data Mining 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3447548.3467220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Elastic Embeddings for Customizing On-Device Recommenders

Abstract: In today's context, deploying data-driven services like recommendation on edge devices instead of cloud servers becomes increasingly attractive due to privacy and network latency concerns. A common practice in building compact on-device recommender systems is to compress their embeddings which are normally the cause of excessive parameterization. However, despite the vast variety of devices and their associated memory constraints, existing memory-efficient recommender systems are only specialized for a fixed m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AutoML for on-device recommender systems automatically designs heterogeneous recommender systems for heterogeneous devices with several restrictions. To deal with one of limitations: memory budget, RULE [107] is proposed to learn the diversified embedding blocks and customise elastic item embeddings for various devices with different memory constraints. AutoML for on-device recommender systems is challenging and distinctive from traditional AutoML or on-device recommender systems, where it emphasises the automated input components and heterology.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AutoML for on-device recommender systems automatically designs heterogeneous recommender systems for heterogeneous devices with several restrictions. To deal with one of limitations: memory budget, RULE [107] is proposed to learn the diversified embedding blocks and customise elastic item embeddings for various devices with different memory constraints. AutoML for on-device recommender systems is challenging and distinctive from traditional AutoML or on-device recommender systems, where it emphasises the automated input components and heterology.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We leverage two metrics, namely recall at rank 𝐾 (Recall@𝐾) [7,10] and normalized discounted cumulative gain at rank 𝐾 (NDCG@𝐾) [9,47] that are widely adopted in recommendation research. We adopt 𝐾 = 10, 20 where all items unvisited by each group are taken as negative samples for evaluation.…”
Section: Baselines and Evaluation Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommender systems have been widely deployed to various scenarios such as advertisement [37], online shopping [3], news apps [35], and many others [1,2,21,27,30,32]. The typical inputs of recommender systems are a large number of categorical (e.g., gender) or numerical (e.g., age) features associated with users and items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these methods set a fixed embedding dimension for all features, which could suffer from the following issues: (1) The embeddings could contain tens of billions of parameters resulting in high memory usage and computation cost. (2) Overparameterizing the low-frequency features might induce overfitting and even unexpected noise. On the other hand, high-frequency features need more parameters to convey fruitful information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%