2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00069.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Experience and Learning Effectiveness in Undergraduate Statistics: Modeling Performance in Traditional and Flexible Learning Environments*

Abstract: This project investigates the relationship between student performance, past mathematics experience, and perceptions of statistics education for two groups of university students studying statistics in different learning environments. One group received the traditional form of teaching with lectures, whereas the other group studied in a more flexible learning mode where lectures were replaced with a computer-managed learning tool and optional small-group workshops facilitated by written lecture notes. The resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The independent variables considered here did not include any psychological attributes such as student satisfaction (Lesser, 1998), cognitive learning styles (Boles, Pillay, & Raj, 1999; Miller, 2005), effect on conceptual understanding (Kim & Pak, 2002), performance with and without time limits (Onwuegbuzie & Seaman, 1995), and reduction of test anxiety (Zanakis & Valenzi, 1997). A study by Cybinski and Selvanathan (2005) presents evidence that students in a flexible environment with lectures replaced by a Web‐based learning tool had more performance anxiety and less enjoyment of statistics. They also found that the negative effect of anxiety was worsened by having less prior exposure to high school mathematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent variables considered here did not include any psychological attributes such as student satisfaction (Lesser, 1998), cognitive learning styles (Boles, Pillay, & Raj, 1999; Miller, 2005), effect on conceptual understanding (Kim & Pak, 2002), performance with and without time limits (Onwuegbuzie & Seaman, 1995), and reduction of test anxiety (Zanakis & Valenzi, 1997). A study by Cybinski and Selvanathan (2005) presents evidence that students in a flexible environment with lectures replaced by a Web‐based learning tool had more performance anxiety and less enjoyment of statistics. They also found that the negative effect of anxiety was worsened by having less prior exposure to high school mathematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, flow is believed to produce positive results, such as higher performance and better learning outcomes. In a study of learning experience, enjoyment was found to be positively related to student attitude and perception of the value toward statistics education (Cybinski & Selvanathan, 2005). Subsequently, the outcomes of flow can change learner characteristics, especially learner skills.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their unfamiliarity with course contents as well as to the difficulty of linking theory with practice, more than 75% of the students feel uncomfortable when dealing with statistics formulas and calculations (Lalayants 2012;Murtonen et al 2008). Statistics anxiety caused by test and class anxiety has a negative relationship to the students' perceived value of statistics and to their prior math experiences (Cybinski and Selvanathan 2005).…”
Section: Test and Class Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%