2013
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning experiences on role‐emerging placements: An exploration from the students' perspective

Abstract: Background/Aim: Occupational therapy educators are challenged to provide students with practical experiences which prepare them for ever changing healthcare contexts on graduation. Role emerging placements have been widely used internationally to help meet this challenge, but research into the learning experiences of students during these innovative placements is limited. This research investigated the enablers and barriers to learning from the perspectives of students on such placements from two European univ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Challenges of Level I nontraditional placements are infrequently identified; however, Knecht-Sabres (2010) discussed logistical issues as a challenge for non-traditional placements. Challenges cited in literature pertaining to Level II non-traditional fieldwork may provide insight as to types of challenges that may occur in Level I non-traditional fieldwork including: (a) the amount of supervision, (b) whether or not the supervision is provided by occupational therapists, (c) the implications for professional identity development in the absence of an occupational therapy supervisor (Dancza et al, 2013;Mulholland & Derdall, 2005;Overton, Clark, & Thomas, 2009), (d) students' perceptions of missing key clinical skills that would have been obtained in a traditional setting (Overton et al, 2009), and (e) managing stress (Dancza et al, 2013).…”
Section: Non-traditional Level I Fieldworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Challenges of Level I nontraditional placements are infrequently identified; however, Knecht-Sabres (2010) discussed logistical issues as a challenge for non-traditional placements. Challenges cited in literature pertaining to Level II non-traditional fieldwork may provide insight as to types of challenges that may occur in Level I non-traditional fieldwork including: (a) the amount of supervision, (b) whether or not the supervision is provided by occupational therapists, (c) the implications for professional identity development in the absence of an occupational therapy supervisor (Dancza et al, 2013;Mulholland & Derdall, 2005;Overton, Clark, & Thomas, 2009), (d) students' perceptions of missing key clinical skills that would have been obtained in a traditional setting (Overton et al, 2009), and (e) managing stress (Dancza et al, 2013).…”
Section: Non-traditional Level I Fieldworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Level I fieldwork took place in a setting that did not employ an occupational therapist and supervision from occupational therapy faculty was indirect, careful consideration was given to the development of classroom learning activities to ensure connection of the experience to the domain of occupational therapy (AOTA, 2009;Dancza et al, 2013;Hanson & Nielsen, 2015;Overton et al, 2009). Strategies utilized included reflection both through discussion and writing (Bazyk et al, 2010;Benson & Witchger Hansen, 2007;Coker, 2010;Knecht-Sabres, 2010;Vroman et al, 2010) and peer support (Knecht-Sabres, 2010;Vroman et al, 2010).…”
Section: Learning Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many practitioners and students have noted concerns over sending inexperienced students into settings where no identified occupational therapy program exists (Thew, Hargreaves, & Cronin-Davis, 2008). Further, many practitioners are hesitant to support this type of fieldwork placement citing that limited supervision can result in a diminished professional identity and lack of necessary entry-level skills compared to traditional 1:1 fieldwork models (Dancza et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whilst the literature on role-emerging placements is increasing, it tends to focus on how they have been implemented in British universities (Wood 2005, Hook and Kenny 2007, Thew, Hargreaves, and Cronin-Davis 2008, to present a rationale for their development (Fortune, Farnworth, and McKinstry 2006, Cooper and Raine 2009, Rodger et al 2007, or reflect the opinions of educators and placement tutors about their effectiveness (Wood 2005, Wilcock, Sledding, andKershaw 2009). Only a small number of papers seek to understand students' experiences in any detail, for example Bossers et al (1997), Totten and Pratt (2001), Fieldhouse and Fedden (2009) and Dancza et al(2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%