2017
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1136656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning faces from variability

Abstract: Research on face learning has tended to use sets of images that vary systematically on dimensions such as pose and illumination. In contrast, we have proposed that exposure to naturally varying images of a person may be a critical part of the familiarization process. Here, we present two experiments investigating face learning with “ambient images”—relatively unconstrained photos taken from internet searches. Participants learned name and face associations for unfamiliar identities presented in high or low wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
170
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
20
170
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Experiment 2, we found that multiple low, but not high, variability images produced improvements in searching in comparison with single images. Although research suggests that higher variability should be expected to produce greater benefits (Menon et al, 2015;Ritchie & Burton, 2017), the current result is likely due to recency and/or context rather than variability. Although multiple images may result in benefits in terms of the information provided of the target's face, there are clearly situations in which larger variability does not necessarily produce better performance (e.g., when that variability informs regarding how someone looked several years ago).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Experiment 2, we found that multiple low, but not high, variability images produced improvements in searching in comparison with single images. Although research suggests that higher variability should be expected to produce greater benefits (Menon et al, 2015;Ritchie & Burton, 2017), the current result is likely due to recency and/or context rather than variability. Although multiple images may result in benefits in terms of the information provided of the target's face, there are clearly situations in which larger variability does not necessarily produce better performance (e.g., when that variability informs regarding how someone looked several years ago).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Our results replicated this effect for searching, with increased prior familiarity with the target resulting in increased likelihood of a correct response. (Ritchie & Burton, 2017) performance, with larger variation across images of the same individual producing increased performance (Menon et al, 2015;Ritchie & Burton, 2017). Further, initial evidence suggests that viewing multiple images of a target may also prove beneficial when searching for that person in a crowd (Mileva & Burton, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations