Learning from clinical supervision collaborations

Borders, L. DiAnne

doi:10.1080/07325223.2023.2196760

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Clinical supervision has been proven to be most effective when practiced collaboratively ( Borders, 2023 ; Snowdon et al, 2017 ). As reported in this current review, collaboration in clinical supervision in Ghana is a multifaceted endeavor, requiring partnership between educational institutions, clinical settings, and the supervisor-supervisee relationship.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers and Facilitators to Clinical Supervision in Ghana: A Scoping Review

Awiagah,

Dordunu,

Hukporti

et al. 2024

SAGE Open Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Clinical supervision involves the professional relationship between an experienced and knowledgeable clinician and a less experienced clinician in which the experienced clinician provides support toward the skills development of the less experienced one. The concept, structure, and format of clinical supervision vary in various jurisdictions and is influenced by the availability of resources, the training needs of supervisees, and organizational structures. Aim The aim of this scoping review was to explore, map out and synthesize the available literature on the facilitators and barriers to clinical supervision in Ghana. Methods The methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley and modified by Levac et al. for scoping reviews, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews were used to ensure a coherent and transparent reporting of literature. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Medline, and Google Scholar using key words and key terms. Articles published between January 1, 2000, and February 28, 2023, were included in the review. Results The initial search across all the databases yielded 208 results. Two independent reviewers completed both the title and abstract, and full text screenings. A third reviewer helped to resolve all discrepancies that arose during the screening process. The review included 20 articles and generated four themes: clinical supervision as a collaborative effort, feedback mechanism, training and adaptation, and challenges with implementation. Conclusion Findings from this review highlight that healthcare professionals in Ghana valued clinical supervision. However, the implementation of clinical supervision is faced with individual and systemic challenges. There is the need for on-going collaboration between educational and clinical institutions to develop modalities that promote clinical supervision in Ghana.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%