2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from Co-expression Networks: Possibilities and Challenges

Abstract: Plants are fascinating and complex organisms. A comprehensive understanding of the organization, function and evolution of plant genes is essential to disentangle important biological processes and to advance crop engineering and breeding strategies. The ultimate aim in deciphering complex biological processes is the discovery of causal genes and regulatory mechanisms controlling these processes. The recent surge of omics data has opened the door to a system-wide understanding of the flow of biological informa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
215
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
(183 reference statements)
2
215
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Proteins with node degree Ͻ10 were discarded. Nodes with clustering coefficient Ͼ0.7 were identified as major hubs (44). In addition, nodes with at least two combinations of the top 5% of the following network centralities (30), closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, and stress centrality, regardless of the clustering coefficient measurement, were considered as hubs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteins with node degree Ͻ10 were discarded. Nodes with clustering coefficient Ͼ0.7 were identified as major hubs (44). In addition, nodes with at least two combinations of the top 5% of the following network centralities (30), closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, and stress centrality, regardless of the clustering coefficient measurement, were considered as hubs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calculated based on dataset median instead of mean (Serin et al, 2016). Recently, GCC has been shown to be a better correlation method for gene expression analysis because of its capacity to detect nonlinear relationships and its insensitivity to outliers (Ma and Wang, 2012).…”
Section: Correlation Methods Perform Better Than MI At Some Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent work has made substantial progress toward describing genomewide expression patterns in many genotypes, environmental conditions, and tissues, relatively little is known about the function and regulation of most maize genes. Because genes with related biological functions or regulatory mechanisms often have similar expression patterns (Aoki et al, 2007), one way to enhance understanding of gene function is by construction of a gene coexpression network (GCN;D'haeseleer et al, 2000;Aoki et al, 2007;Usadel et al, 2009;Li et al, 2015c;Serin et al, 2016). GCNs are constructed using data mining tools and algorithms that describe the relatedness between the expression patterns of multiple genes in a pairwise fashion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, the RAP method has been implemented as an R package, providing a flexible framework for aggregating gene prioritizations from different types of biological networks. Besides the functional association networks (e.g., AraNet v2 and STRING), co-expression networks capture the functional relationships between genes solely from gene expression datasets, which can also be integrated in RAP for gene functional analysis in several crop species, including maize, rice, soybean and wheat (Mutwil et al, 2011; Aoki et al, 2016; Ruprecht et al, 2016; Serin et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%