Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2020
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2020/298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from Few Positives: a Provably Accurate Metric Learning Algorithm to Deal with Imbalanced Data

Abstract: Learning from imbalanced data, where the positive examples are very scarce, remains a challenging task from both a theoretical and algorithmic perspective. In this paper, we address this problem using a metric learning strategy. Unlike the state-of-the-art methods, our algorithm MLFP, for Metric Learning from Few Positives, learns a new representation that is used only when a test query is compared to a minority training example. From a geometric perspective, it artificially brings positive examples c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we can note that tuning γ is equivalent to building a diagonal matrix (with γ 2 in the diagonal) and applying a Mahalanobis distance only between a query and a positive example. This comment opens the door to a new family of metric learning algorithms dedicated to optimizing a PSD matrix under (F P, F N )-based constraints that could leverage recent metric learning approaches for imbalanced data [34]. 7: Results for k = 1 with G 1 as performance measure over 5 runs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we can note that tuning γ is equivalent to building a diagonal matrix (with γ 2 in the diagonal) and applying a Mahalanobis distance only between a query and a positive example. This comment opens the door to a new family of metric learning algorithms dedicated to optimizing a PSD matrix under (F P, F N )-based constraints that could leverage recent metric learning approaches for imbalanced data [34]. 7: Results for k = 1 with G 1 as performance measure over 5 runs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%