2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from picture books: Infants’ use of naming information

Abstract: The present study investigated whether naming would facilitate infants’ transfer of information from picture books to the real world. Eighteen- and 21-month-olds learned a novel label for a novel object depicted in a picture book. Infants then saw a second picture book in which an adult demonstrated how to elicit the object’s non-obvious property. Accompanying narration described the pictures using the object’s newly learnt label. Infants were subsequently tested with the real-world object depicted in the book… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, although signs serve the same communicative functions as words, they are based on manual movement; Numerous imitation studies demonstrate infants' ability to learn a sequence of movement from a screen (Barr & Hayne, ; Barr, Muentener, & Garcia, ; Barr, Muentener, Garcia, Fujimoto, et al., ; Barr, Shuck, Salerno, Atkinson, & Linebarger, ; Barr & Wyss, ; Hayne, Herbert, & Simcock, ; Meltzoff, , ; Strouse & Troseth, ). Furthermore, verbal labels, included in the elicited production task, may have served as reminders for the movements (Barr & Wyss, ; Hayne & Herbert, ; Khu, Graham, & Ganea, ). Although signs did serve as labels in this context, it may be that this manual form of labeling is easier to learn from the screen than is verbal labeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, although signs serve the same communicative functions as words, they are based on manual movement; Numerous imitation studies demonstrate infants' ability to learn a sequence of movement from a screen (Barr & Hayne, ; Barr, Muentener, & Garcia, ; Barr, Muentener, Garcia, Fujimoto, et al., ; Barr, Shuck, Salerno, Atkinson, & Linebarger, ; Barr & Wyss, ; Hayne, Herbert, & Simcock, ; Meltzoff, , ; Strouse & Troseth, ). Furthermore, verbal labels, included in the elicited production task, may have served as reminders for the movements (Barr & Wyss, ; Hayne & Herbert, ; Khu, Graham, & Ganea, ). Although signs did serve as labels in this context, it may be that this manual form of labeling is easier to learn from the screen than is verbal labeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study shows that the pictorial realism of the pictures in the book influenced children's transfer of the rattle assembly, and that this book feature interacts with development. When realistic photos are used, even 13-month-olds can use information presented in a picture book to make inductive inferences about non-obvious properties of real objects and attempt to elicit those properties through particular actions that were depicted in the book (Keates et al, 2014 ; see also Khu et al, 2014 for a study using the same task).…”
Section: Domains Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Video helpedtoddler to transfer the information to the real world. 29,30 Toddler imitated of what is exemplified by the model in the video, in the form of Lili and Lilo characters which was similar to his age. According to the theory of cognitive development proposed by Piaget, the learning process with video modeling to the toddler was the process of imitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%