2020
DOI: 10.1177/0162643420928336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Gains From the KinderTEK® iPad Math Program: Does Timing of a Preventative Intervention Matter?

Abstract: A quasi-experimental design in six kindergarten classrooms ( n = 123 students) was used to study the effects of the KinderTEK iPad–based math program on the math achievement of students in general education classrooms. Student math outcomes in three treatment ( early start) classrooms were compared to math outcomes for students in three comparison ( late start) classrooms. Results suggested that relatively brief exposure to KinderTEK produced gains on distal measures of early numeracy and that, on average, tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The associated included studies focused on typically developing children aged between 4 and 7 years old with an experimental design (randomised control trial or quasi‐experimental design) (Berkowitz et al, 2015; Cary et al, 2020; Grimes et al, 2020; Kosko & Ferdig, 2016; Outhwaite et al, 2018; Schacter & Jo, 2017; Spencer, 2013; Wu, 2020). Two studies reported subgroup analyses on children identified as underachieving in mathematics (Cary et al, 2020; Wu, 2020). However, for the purposes of this analysis, the extracted within‐group effect sizes focused on the whole sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated included studies focused on typically developing children aged between 4 and 7 years old with an experimental design (randomised control trial or quasi‐experimental design) (Berkowitz et al, 2015; Cary et al, 2020; Grimes et al, 2020; Kosko & Ferdig, 2016; Outhwaite et al, 2018; Schacter & Jo, 2017; Spencer, 2013; Wu, 2020). Two studies reported subgroup analyses on children identified as underachieving in mathematics (Cary et al, 2020; Wu, 2020). However, for the purposes of this analysis, the extracted within‐group effect sizes focused on the whole sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%