Abstract:Two experiments investigated how goal setting and progress feedback affect self-efficacy and writing achievement. Children received writing strategy instruction and were given a process goal of learning the strategy, a product goal of writing paragraphs, or a general goal of working productively. Half of the process goal children periodically received feedback on their progress in learning the strategy. In Experiment 2 we also explored transfer (maintenance and generalization) of achievement outcomes. The process goal with progress feedback treatment had the greatest impact on achievement outcomes to include maintenance and generalization; the process goal without feedback condition resulted in some benefits compared with the product and general goal conditions. Self-efficacy was highly predictive of writing skill and strategy use. Suggestions for future research and implications for classroom practice are discussed.
Article:The purpose of the present investigation was to explore the effects on children's achievement outcomes of process and product goals and goal progress feedback during writing instruction. The conceptual basis of this research was goal setting theory and research, which shows that goal setting promotes motivation and learning (Bandura, 1986;Locke & Latham, 1990). The effects of goals are not automatic, however, but rather depend on goal properties: specificity, proximity, difficulty. Goals that denote specific performance standards, are temporally close at hand, or are viewed as difficult but attainable, enhance performance better than goals that are general (e.g., "Do your best"), temporally distant, or perceived as very easy or very difficult, respectively (Schunk, 1990).