Learning health systems in low-income and middle-income countries: exploring evidence and expert insights

Abstract

IntroductionLearning health systems (LHS) is a multifaceted subject. This paper reviewed current concepts as well as real-world experiences of LHS, drawing on published and unpublished knowledge in order to identify and describe important principles and practices that characterise LHS in low/middle-income country (LMIC) settings.MethodsWe adopted an exploratory approach to the literature review, recognising there are limited studies that focus specifically on system-wide learning in LMICs, but a vast set of connected bodies of literature. 116 studies were included, drawn from an electronic literature search of published and grey literature. In addition, 17 interviews were conducted with health policy and research experts to gain experiential knowledge.ResultsThe findings were structured by eight domains on learning enablers. All of these interact with one another and influence actors from community to international levels.We found that learning comes from the connection between information, deliberation, and action. Moreover, these processes occur at different levels. It is therefore important to consider experiential knowledge from multiple levels and experiences. Creating spaces and providing resources for communities, staff and managers to deliberate on their challenges and find solutions has political implications, however, and is challenging, particularly when resources are constrained, funding and accountability are fragmented and the focus is short-term and narrow. Nevertheless, we can learn from countries that have managed to develop institutional mechanisms and human capacities which help health systems respond to changing environments with ‘best fit’ solutions.ConclusionHealth systems are knowledge producers, but learning is not automatic. It needs to be valued and facilitated. Everyday governance of health systems can create spaces for reflective practice and learning within routine processes at different levels. This article highlights important enablers, but there remains much work to be done on developing this field of knowledge.

How do we design and evaluate health system strengthening? Collaborative development of a set of health system process goals

“…By looking at the health system effects of HSS interventions, our aim is to move away from theories of change or evaluation models that focus on building blocks and conceptualise HSS as an (often donor funded) external intervention in a health system, thus 'verticalising' what are in fact systemic HSS interventions. Rather, in line with proposals of the 2019 Perspective, 2 we want to connect HSS to the wider literature on resilience and learning health systems, 15,[20][21][22] which identifies desirable features for strong health systems, such as flexibility and adaptation, collaborative mechanisms, and intelligence gathering, as well as health system characteristics of accountable, affordable, accessible and reliable care. Following this approach, the proposed framework for HSS monitoring, evaluation and learning sets a list of overarching "health system process goals", which capture the desirable attributes of a well functioning health system.…”

Increased utilisation and quality: a focus on inequality and a learning health system approach—explaining Nepal’s success in reducing maternal and newborn mortality 2000–2020

“…The article draws on the Learning Health Systems literature—that argues that successful health systems show a commitment to learning, and ‘connection between information, deliberation and action’. And that moreover health systems are strengthened and perform better if they focus on ‘developing institutional and human capacities’ at different levels within the health system, and creating space for ‘reflective practice and learning within routine processes’ 7 8…”

Learning from success: the main drivers of the maternal and newborn health transition in seven positive-outlier countries and implications for future policies and programmes

“…We developed and used two frameworks: one which describes a comprehensive range of potential determinants12 and a second one which permits us to characterise our seven countries vis-a-vis others, and to guide suggestions for the future 13. We also explicitly considered whether countries had ‘learning health systems’ 14 15…”