2011
DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2010.012.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning how to multiply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of LM3 ranges between 1.00 and 3.00, where 1 equates to spending the whole initial sum outside of the local area, and 3 if all spending across the three rounds stays local (Sacks, 2002). Consequently, if economic actors decide to spend locally (which is partly a result of their own decisions, and partly reflects the accessibility of goods and the structure of the operating environment), the local economic impact of an initial sum of money rises (Bengo et al, 2016; Meter, 2010). Apart from measuring the ratio of money spent locally, LM3 calculations also enable tracking which types of suppliers (or staff) re-spend money within the target area (Sacks, 2002).…”
Section: Methods and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of LM3 ranges between 1.00 and 3.00, where 1 equates to spending the whole initial sum outside of the local area, and 3 if all spending across the three rounds stays local (Sacks, 2002). Consequently, if economic actors decide to spend locally (which is partly a result of their own decisions, and partly reflects the accessibility of goods and the structure of the operating environment), the local economic impact of an initial sum of money rises (Bengo et al, 2016; Meter, 2010). Apart from measuring the ratio of money spent locally, LM3 calculations also enable tracking which types of suppliers (or staff) re-spend money within the target area (Sacks, 2002).…”
Section: Methods and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, and perhaps most importantly from a community development perspective, the results of an I-O based analysis have limited utility to community practitioners and stakeholders because the calculation process is often viewed as a "black box," using modeling equations that are not readily understood by community members or even systems-level stakeholders (Meter, 2011). The very people being studied seldom understand how I-O results were derived, although they are often asked to provide sensitive data to modelers and then to accept findings on faith.…”
Section: Practical Limitations To Common Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in his study of Italy, Putnam argues that civic engagement is not a function of wealth, but instead that economic development and effective government are consequences of social connectivity and capital (1993). Since the economic multiplier is a measure of how many times a dollar "turns over" inside a given geography before leaving, one would expect that the stronger the sense of community connectedness, the greater the likelihood that financial transactions will cycle money among community members (Meter, 2011).…”
Section: The Economic Value Of Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, economic multipliers measure how a specific business or sector interacts with the prevailing infrastructure (Meter, 2010). Often the net impact of local food investments is relatively small compared to the prevailing economy, so the most successful practitioners insert new functions into the software to ask questions that have meaningful answers.…”
Section: Local Food Economy Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%