2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30538-5_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Languages from Positive Data and a Finite Number of Queries

Abstract: A computational model for learning languages in the limit from full positive data and a bounded number of queries to the teacher (oracle) is introduced and explored. Equivalence, superset, and subset queries are considered (for the latter one we consider also a variant when the learner tests every conjecture, but the number of negative answers is uniformly bounded). If the answer is negative, the teacher may provide a counterexample. We consider several types of counterexamples: arbitrary, least counterexample… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since a query learner identifies the target concept with just a single hypothesis, we allude to this scheme as one-shot learning. 4 Recently, the combination of these two approaches [11,12] as well as the common features of learners in either model [14,15] have gained interest in the learning theory community. [14,15] contributes a systematic analysis of common features of both approaches, thereby focussing on the identification of formal languages, ranging over indexable classes of recursive languages, as target concepts, see [2,13,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a query learner identifies the target concept with just a single hypothesis, we allude to this scheme as one-shot learning. 4 Recently, the combination of these two approaches [11,12] as well as the common features of learners in either model [14,15] have gained interest in the learning theory community. [14,15] contributes a systematic analysis of common features of both approaches, thereby focussing on the identification of formal languages, ranging over indexable classes of recursive languages, as target concepts, see [2,13,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is based on the philosophy that parents often correct their children by providing them counterexamples. This part is based on work done by the authors 13,12 . We also introduce and briefly consider a model in which learners are provided with random negative examples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [JK05a] and [JK05b], we also consider Res variants for models SubQ n , NC n , and GNC n as well as their variants when the least (rather than arbitrary) counterexample is provided -in this case we use the prefix L (for example, LNC n ). Consequently, we explore relationships between B-models and models using limited number of queries (including those getting just answers 'yes' or 'no'), or limited number of arbitrary or least counterexamples, or just answers 'no'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-the learner makes subset query for every conjecture until n negative answers have been received; that is, the learner can ask potentially indefinite number of questions (however, still finite if the learning process eventually gives a correct grammar), but he is charged only when receiving a negative answer; this model was considered in [JK05b] under the name NC n ;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation