2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1902.00768
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Linear Dynamical Systems with Semi-Parametric Least Squares

Abstract: We analyze a simple prefiltered variation of the least squares estimator for the problem of estimation with biased, semi-parametric noise, an error model studied more broadly in causal statistics and active learning. We prove an oracle inequality which demonstrates that this procedure provably mitigates the variance introduced by long-term dependencies. We then demonstrate that prefiltered least squares yields, to our knowledge, the first algorithm that provably estimates the parameters of partially-observed l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the partially observable linear systems, similar to the trend in fully observable counterparts, most of the prior works focus on the system identification aspects [Ljung, 1999, Chen et al, 1992, Juang et al, 1993, Phan et al, 1994, Lee and Zhang, 2019, Oymak and Ozay, 2018, Sarkar et al, 2019, Simchowitz et al, 2019, Lee and Lamperski, 2019, Umenberger et al, 2019, Tsiamis and Pappas, 2020. A body of work aimed to extend the problem of estimation and prediction to online convex optimization where a set of strong theoretical guarantees on cumulative prediction errors are provided [Abbasi-Yadkori et al, 2014, Hazan et al, 2017, Arora et al, 2018, Hazan et al, 2018, Lee and Zhang, 2019, Ghai et al, 2020 Building upon the system identification algorithms, Lale et al [2020a] provides Õ(T 2/3 ) regret upper bound in system with stochastic noise using OFU.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the partially observable linear systems, similar to the trend in fully observable counterparts, most of the prior works focus on the system identification aspects [Ljung, 1999, Chen et al, 1992, Juang et al, 1993, Phan et al, 1994, Lee and Zhang, 2019, Oymak and Ozay, 2018, Sarkar et al, 2019, Simchowitz et al, 2019, Lee and Lamperski, 2019, Umenberger et al, 2019, Tsiamis and Pappas, 2020. A body of work aimed to extend the problem of estimation and prediction to online convex optimization where a set of strong theoretical guarantees on cumulative prediction errors are provided [Abbasi-Yadkori et al, 2014, Hazan et al, 2017, Arora et al, 2018, Hazan et al, 2018, Lee and Zhang, 2019, Ghai et al, 2020 Building upon the system identification algorithms, Lale et al [2020a] provides Õ(T 2/3 ) regret upper bound in system with stochastic noise using OFU.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the setting where the observations of the system's state evolution are partial and noisy, learning the dynamics of linear systems brings a series of challenges due to lack of direct access to the underlying events. For partially observable systems, a variety of methods have been proposed to learn the open-loop system dynamics via exciting the system with random and uncorrelated noise for long enough that the regression methods provide efficient estimations of the model parameters [Oymak and Ozay, 2018, Sarkar et al, 2019, Simchowitz et al, 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advances in high-dimensional statistics [6], there has been a recent shift from asymptotic analysis with infinite data to statistical analysis of system identification with finite samples. Over the past two years there have been significant advances in understanding finite sample system identification for both fully-observed systems [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] as well as partially-observed systems [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. A tutorial can be found in [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In control, results have focused on finite time regret bounds for the LQR problem with unknown dynamics Dean et al, 2017Dean et al, , 2018Mania et al, 2019;Dean et al, 2019;Cohen et al, 2019), with Simchowitz & Foster (2020) ultimately settling the minimax optimal regret in terms of dimension and time horizon; others have considered regret in online adversarial settings (Agarwal et al, 2019;. Recent results in system identification have focused on obtaining finite time high probability bounds on the estimation error of the system's parameters when observing the evolution over time (Tu et al, 2017;Faradonbeh et al, 2018;Hazan et al, 2018;Hardt et al, 2018;Simchowitz et al, 2018;Sarkar & Rakhlin, 2018;Oymak & Ozay, 2019;Simchowitz et al, 2019;Tsiamis & Pappas, 2019). Existing results rely on excitation from random noise to guarantee learning and do not consider the problem of learning with arbitrary sequences of inputs or optimally choosing inputs for excitation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%